H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Andrea Petkovic vs Ana Ivanovic H2H: 1-3
Ana Ivanovic holds a 3–1 lead over Andrea Petkovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ana Ivanovic leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ana Ivanovic won the 2013 Stuttgart third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 38
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2013* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Ana Ivanovic | 6-3 6-2 | Andrea Petkovic | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2012* | Linz | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-4 6-3 | Andrea Petkovic | Match data |
| Jun 18, 2010* | 's Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Andrea Petkovic | 6-4 6-7(4) 6-1 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
| Nov 2, 2006* | Hasselt | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-3 7-5 | Andrea Petkovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Petkovic | #139 | #9 | 4,640 | 1,990 | 273 | 225 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| Ana Ivanovic | #63 | #1 | 6,912 | 2,095 | 419 | 213 | 66.3% | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Petkovic | Ana Ivanovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #4 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 2009 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,825 | 1 | 8 |
| 22 | 2010 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #17 | 1,938 | 1 | 10 |
| 23 | 2011 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #10 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #22 | 1,877 | 1 | 11 |
| 24 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #13 | 1,872 | 1 | 11 |
| 25 | 2013 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #43 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,855 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 2014 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,826 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #5 | 2,019 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #24 | 1,685 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #16 | 1,857 | 1 | 15 |
| 28 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #63 | 1,702 | 1 | 15 |
| 29 | 2017 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #99 | 1,631 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,712 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,730 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |