H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrea Petkovic vs Daniela Hantuchova H2H: 3-0
Andrea Petkovic holds a 3–0 lead over Daniela Hantuchova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andrea Petkovic leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Petkovic won the 2013 Cincinnati second round 2-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 43
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2013* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Andrea Petkovic | 2-6 6-4 6-1 | Daniela Hantuchova | Match data |
| May 21, 2011* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Andrea Petkovic | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Daniela Hantuchova | Match data |
| Jan 9, 2010* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Andrea Petkovic | 6-4 6-2 | Daniela Hantuchova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Petkovic | #139 | #9 | 4,640 | 1,990 | 273 | 225 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| Daniela Hantuchova | #317 | #5 | 2,897 | 1,968 | 457 | 361 | 55.9% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Petkovic | Daniela Hantuchova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #19 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2009 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2011 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #10 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,930 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2013 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #43 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #21 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2014 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,826 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,807 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #24 | 1,685 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #24 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2017 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #99 | 1,631 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2018 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,712 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #62 | 1,577 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #83 | 1,574 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,730 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #228 | 1,514 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,524 | 0 | 7 |