H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Andrea Petkovic vs Kaia Kanepi H2H: 0-3

Kaia Kanepi holds a 3–0 lead over Andrea Petkovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kaia Kanepi leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kaia Kanepi won the 2015 Brisbane International first round 6-4 5-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Petkovic
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Kaia Kanepi
Estonia Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kaia Kanepi #52 6-4 5-7 6-4 Andrea Petkovic #13 Match data Jan 7, 2015* R32 Brisbane International Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Kaia Kanepi #34 6-1 7-6(7) Andrea Petkovic #10 Match data Jan 7, 2012* QF Brisbane International Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Kaia Kanepi #16 6-3 3-6 6-3 Andrea Petkovic #24 Match data Feb 17, 2011* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Petkovic #139 #9 4,640 1,988 279 228 55.0% 0 0 1 2 4 7
Kaia Kanepi #1,322 #15 2,760 1,908 264 236 52.8% 0 0 0 2 2 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Petkovic Kaia Kanepi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0
18 2006 0–1 0.0% #242 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2007 2–4 33.3% #93 1,502 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #229 1,484 0 0
20 2008 0–1 0.0% #378 1,500 0 0 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,527 0 0
21 2009 11–8 57.9% #55 1,614 0 1 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,606 0 0
22 2010 33–24 57.9% #32 1,787 0 1 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,581 0 0
23 2011 50–17 74.6% #10 1,973 0 2 2008 30–21 58.8% #27 1,761 0 0
24 2012 9–9 50.0% #125 1,855 0 2 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,603 0 0
25 2013 19–14 57.6% #43 1,801 0 2 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,842 0 1
26 2014 39–22 63.9% #13 1,828 0 5 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,798 0 1
27 2015 29–25 53.7% #24 1,689 0 6 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,861 0 3
28 2016 19–20 48.7% #55 1,694 0 6 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,838 0 4
29 2017 12–21 36.4% #99 1,648 0 6 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,719 0 4
30 2018 16–14 53.3% #64 1,725 0 6 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,659 0 4
31 2019 16–19 45.7% #78 1,716 0 6 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,663 0 4
32 2020 0–1 0.0% #102 1,700 0 6 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,731 0 4
33 2021 16–16 50.0% #75 1,729 0 7 2018 12–12 50.0% #61 1,776 0 4
34 2022 8–12 40.0% #139 1,708 0 7 2019 9–9 50.0% #101 1,761 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,729 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,699 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,802 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2023 6–15 28.6% #168 1,627 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Petkovic Kaia Kanepi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2006 8 8 16 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2010 21 14 35 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 2007 4 6 10 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2011 33 10 43 76.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2008 19 12 31 61.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2012 8 8 16 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 9 13 22 40.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2013 12 9 21 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
26 2014 15 14 29 51.7% 19 5 24 79.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2011 14 9 23 60.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
27 2015 19 18 37 51.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2012 13 6 19 68.4% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 2017 10 12 22 45.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 12 12 24 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2018 13 9 22 59.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2019 10 11 21 47.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2020 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2018 9 6 15 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 2022 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2019 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 10 8 18 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 170 142 312 54.5% 79 57 136 58.1% 24 26 50 48.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — 156 134 290 53.8% 88 76 164 53.7% 16 24 40 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 452/505 of Andrea Petkovic's and 427/488 of Kaia Kanepi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrea Petkovic Kaia Kanepi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2007 3/6 1.7 2.3 72.7% 59.0% 67.8% 57.1% 38.9% 60.9% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 18/19 3.1 2.5 64.4% 64.3% 48.7% 51.8% 45.7% 58.4% 46.5% 2006 5/30 3.2 3.6 50.1% 63.5% 51.7% 55.9% 43.1% 57.7% 43.7%
22 2010 53/57 3.9 2.8 63.6% 62.9% 48.4% 58.6% 46.9% 57.5% 44.4% 2007 21/30 3.0 7.0 57.0% 65.6% 38.7% 49.4% 52.0% 54.0% 42.6%
23 2011 56/67 2.2 2.1 70.0% 62.7% 50.3% 56.4% 50.6% 59.0% 48.2% 2008 37/51 2.4 5.1 58.3% 64.6% 45.9% 53.8% 50.1% 56.9% 45.8%
24 2012 18/18 1.1 1.9 74.6% 57.5% 48.1% 47.6% 43.6% 55.2% 46.9% 2009 35/36 3.1 5.3 52.3% 64.9% 42.8% 47.9% 52.3% 54.2% 43.8%
25 2013 32/33 2.2 3.2 66.8% 63.7% 47.7% 55.2% 53.4% 58.3% 47.2% 2010 42/46 3.7 5.1 59.4% 68.5% 44.9% 53.1% 44.3% 59.0% 47.2%
26 2014 52/61 1.8 2.7 68.3% 61.4% 46.8% 48.8% 51.1% 56.9% 46.4% 2011 35/36 4.4 4.3 57.1% 67.9% 44.3% 58.6% 44.1% 57.8% 44.4%
27 2015 40/54 1.6 3.1 66.0% 61.4% 50.5% 51.1% 49.4% 57.6% 45.3% 2012 34/34 4.0 4.7 57.0% 70.7% 48.0% 55.5% 51.0% 61.0% 47.8%
28 2016 38/39 1.9 3.9 64.0% 62.4% 44.9% 48.5% 47.6% 56.1% 45.2% 2013 30/31 4.1 4.5 55.7% 69.5% 47.3% 59.5% 45.7% 59.5% 43.9%
29 2017 29/33 0.5 3.3 69.4% 56.2% 42.3% 48.1% 42.0% 52.1% 46.1% 2014 36/36 4.1 5.5 55.7% 65.5% 43.2% 50.9% 45.3% 55.4% 43.2%
30 2018 26/30 1.4 3.8 66.1% 60.2% 47.0% 58.6% 47.7% 55.6% 44.4% 2015 18/20 3.5 4.7 55.8% 66.6% 45.7% 55.4% 59.7% 57.3% 41.0%
31 2019 35/35 2.0 3.9 63.0% 60.8% 44.2% 50.1% 44.5% 54.7% 43.1% 2016 1/1 1.0 4.0 65.3% 65.6% 11.8% 16.7% 100.0% 46.9% 38.7%
32 2020 1/1 2.0 6.0 63.5% 54.5% 15.8% 14.3% 50.0% 40.4% 39.7% 2017 6/6 2.0 2.7 71.5% 61.5% 44.5% 61.3% 43.3% 56.5% 42.1%
33 2021 32/32 2.5 3.8 64.5% 60.6% 47.6% 49.0% 50.7% 56.0% 44.7% 2018 22/24 2.6 4.5 59.6% 64.2% 47.7% 53.3% 45.4% 57.7% 44.9%
34 2022 19/20 2.7 3.5 64.9% 61.1% 44.2% 49.2% 42.7% 55.3% 39.5% 2019 18/18 3.5 4.7 58.4% 66.1% 42.5% 47.5% 39.9% 56.0% 44.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 5/5 3.6 3.2 58.7% 62.0% 47.8% 41.4% 49.8% 56.5% 45.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 22/23 3.7 4.6 51.7% 65.7% 46.8% 49.5% 54.1% 56.4% 41.5%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 39/40 4.6 3.7 55.9% 68.5% 49.0% 49.4% 45.1% 59.7% 43.1%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 21/21 2.5 3.1 57.0% 66.2% 46.9% 46.5% 42.8% 57.7% 40.7%
Career — 452/507 2.1 3.1 66.5% 61.4% 47.3% 52.2% 48.0% 56.6% 45.4% — 427/500 3.6 4.7 56.7% 66.8% 45.4% 52.4% 47.7% 57.5% 44.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Petkovic Kaia Kanepi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1497 105.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.28
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1498 103.4 — — — — — +23 — 40.0% -0.90 — — — +0.03
18 2006 1497 107.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 1503 107.1 +1.50 +0.78 1.075 51.4% +9 +35 — 35.7% -0.50 1–1 — — +0.06 2004 1485 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.19
20 2008 1501 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.24 2005 1527 114.1 — — — — +28 — — 54.5% +0.18 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.08
21 2009 1614 128.0 +1.55 +1.69 1.118 52.5% -54 +32 — 55.0% +0.52 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.7 +0.67 2006 1607 113.9 +0.07 -1.13 1.033 50.5% +4 -62 — 47.9% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.1 +0.19
22 2010 1788 148.0 +2.10 +1.40 1.046 50.9% -23 -95 -103 54.8% +0.44 13–10 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 106.9 -2.09 2007 1581 120.1 -1.50 -0.76 0.926 48.4% +17 +20 -16 46.5% -0.18 4–7 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 96.3 +0.10
23 2011 1974 155.4 +3.70 +4.59 1.176 53.6% -8 -117 -298 67.6% +1.21 14–6 (70%) 6–5 (55%) 107.7 +0.95 2008 1761 142.2 +1.74 +1.87 1.063 51.4% -2 -50 — 55.6% +0.40 13–9 (59%) 9–4 (69%) 107.7 +0.04
24 2012 1855 137.0 +0.30 +1.98 1.047 50.8% +13 — — 51.3% +0.38 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 100.8 -1.34 2009 1604 134.2 -0.69 +1.03 0.958 49.2% +69 +58 — 45.0% -0.20 4–8 (33%) 0–7 (0%) 89.0 +0.79
25 2013 1802 138.0 +2.53 +2.59 1.133 52.5% +13 +56 — 56.6% +0.67 7–7 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 -1.81 2010 1842 146.9 +2.60 +3.18 1.151 53.0% -58 -100 -165 63.4% +0.93 3–8 (27%) 9–3 (75%) 101.4 -1.00
26 2014 1828 145.1 +0.94 +2.73 1.076 51.6% -34 +124 -137 59.4% +0.64 14–7 (67%) 8–7 (53%) 104.6 +0.56 2011 1799 142.9 +1.95 +1.23 1.051 51.0% +49 -115 -218 50.6% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 3–6 (33%) 97.9 +0.49
27 2015 1690 138.2 -0.26 +3.30 1.069 51.5% +6 +218 +14 52.9% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 5–8 (38%) 95.7 +3.27 2012 1862 140.4 +3.77 +2.86 1.226 54.3% -34 -10 — 67.5% +1.30 7–2 (78%) 3–2 (60%) 104.5 +0.29
28 2016 1695 134.5 0.00 +1.98 1.029 50.5% +17 +124 +6 52.3% +0.25 6–8 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.2 +0.16 2013 1838 132.3 +2.40 +0.55 1.085 51.8% -37 +75 -164 62.9% +0.74 6–2 (75%) 7–2 (78%) 106.6 +0.19
29 2017 1649 122.9 -3.25 +1.84 0.962 49.0% +30 +25 +34 40.8% -0.36 5–9 (36%) 3–1 (75%) 94.0 +0.52 2014 1719 134.8 +0.25 +0.12 0.969 49.5% +38 +81 -56 48.9% -0.16 7–9 (44%) 9–4 (69%) 97.8 -0.89
30 2018 1725 133.1 -0.84 +0.44 1.000 50.1% +4 -68 — 52.9% +0.19 6–4 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 102.8 -0.49 2015 1659 126.5 -0.20 +0.50 0.961 49.3% +51 +100 — 47.5% -0.15 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.35
31 2019 1716 128.9 -1.22 -0.16 0.950 49.1% -1 -46 -56 48.0% -0.12 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 103.2 -0.57 2016 1663 113.1 +1.02 -0.64 0.730 42.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.02
32 2020 1700 98.6 -0.48 +2.36 0.665 40.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.03 2017 1732 125.4 -0.85 +0.35 0.969 49.3% +33 — — 57.1% -0.14 2–0 — — +0.38
33 2021 1730 129.0 -0.07 +1.75 1.016 50.4% -44 +70 -86 47.8% -0.01 4–5 (44%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -2.21 2018 1777 140.3 +1.23 +0.94 1.059 51.2% +67 -33 -156 54.7% +0.21 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 93.5 -0.34
34 2022 1709 124.6 -1.01 -1.99 0.884 47.5% -28 +78 -115 45.2% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 98.7 -1.76 2019 1762 130.8 -0.84 +2.11 1.014 50.2% +14 +32 — 48.9% 0.00 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 102.0 -0.46
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1729 113.7 +0.66 +1.49 1.042 51.0% +2 — — 41.7% +0.17 1–1 0–2 — -0.21
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1700 135.8 +0.07 -0.08 0.950 49.1% +53 +14 — 44.0% -0.34 4–2 (67%) 2–5 (29%) 99.7 -1.55
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1802 144.9 +2.41 +0.90 1.071 51.2% +48 +6 -236 54.7% +0.25 11–8 (58%) 6–7 (46%) 100.8 -0.84
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1627 124.3 +1.07 -1.99 0.962 49.0% +69 +54 — 38.0% -0.72 1–7 (13%) 2–8 (20%) 87.2 -0.08
Career — 1989 144.1 +0.65 +2.02 1.047 51.0% -6 +34 -75 54.0% +0.36 91–79 (54%) 53–55 (49%) 102.0 -0.93 — 1909 143.0 +1.22 +1.05 1.039 50.8% +24 +4 -153 52.4% +0.17 85–88 (49%) 63–63 (50%) 96.4 -0.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.