H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Andrea Petkovic vs Ksenia Pervak H2H: 1-1

Andrea Petkovic and Ksenia Pervak are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ksenia Pervak leads 1–0 on grass, while Andrea Petkovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Petkovic won the 2012 Luxembourg quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Petkovic
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Ksenia Pervak
RUS Age 35 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Petkovic #182 6-3 6-2 Ksenia Pervak #106 Match data Oct 20, 2012* QF Luxembourg International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Ksenia Pervak #89 6-4 7-6(2) Andrea Petkovic #13 Match data Jun 26, 2011* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Petkovic #139 #9 4,640 1,988 279 228 55.0% 0 0 1 2 4 7
Ksenia Pervak #834 #37 1,475 1,702 53 63 45.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Petkovic Ksenia Pervak
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2006 0–1 0.0% #242 1,497 0 0 2009 3–5 37.5% #129 1,516 0 0
19 2007 2–4 33.3% #93 1,502 0 0 2010 7–9 43.8% #97 1,540 0 0
20 2008 0–1 0.0% #378 1,500 0 0 2011 23–17 57.5% #39 1,669 0 1
21 2009 11–8 57.9% #55 1,614 0 1 2012 14–22 38.9% #103 1,587 0 1
22 2010 33–24 57.9% #32 1,787 0 1 2013 4–6 40.0% #125 1,595 0 1
23 2011 50–17 74.6% #10 1,973 0 2 2014 2–4 33.3% #151 1,583 0 1
24 2012 9–9 50.0% #125 1,855 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 2013 19–14 57.6% #43 1,801 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 2014 39–22 63.9% #13 1,828 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 2015 29–25 53.7% #24 1,689 0 6 — — — — — — —
28 2016 19–20 48.7% #55 1,694 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 2017 12–21 36.4% #99 1,648 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2018 16–14 53.3% #64 1,725 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2019 16–19 45.7% #78 1,716 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2020 0–1 0.0% #102 1,700 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 2021 16–16 50.0% #75 1,729 0 7 — — — — — — —
34 2022 8–12 40.0% #139 1,708 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Petkovic Ksenia Pervak
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 2007 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2010 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 16 11 27 59.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
21 2009 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2012 10 14 24 41.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2010 21 14 35 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 2013 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 33 10 43 76.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2014 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2012 8 8 16 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 12 9 21 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2014 15 14 29 51.7% 19 5 24 79.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 19 18 37 51.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 10 12 22 45.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 13 9 22 59.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 10 11 21 47.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 170 142 312 54.5% 79 57 136 58.1% 24 26 50 48.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — 40 44 84 47.6% 9 15 24 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 452/505 of Andrea Petkovic's and 108/116 of Ksenia Pervak's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrea Petkovic Ksenia Pervak
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 7/8 0.7 5.1 63.2% 58.1% 43.6% 57.0% 48.4% 53.4% 41.5%
19 2007 3/6 1.7 2.3 72.7% 59.0% 67.8% 57.1% 38.9% 60.9% 42.0% 2010 16/16 0.3 3.4 72.5% 57.9% 37.8% 48.6% 44.8% 53.1% 44.9%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 36/40 0.7 3.6 65.0% 59.6% 45.6% 42.3% 47.4% 54.7% 46.2%
21 2009 18/19 3.1 2.5 64.4% 64.3% 48.7% 51.8% 45.7% 58.4% 46.5% 2012 33/36 1.0 4.4 64.0% 59.8% 43.8% 48.2% 53.6% 54.1% 42.7%
22 2010 53/57 3.9 2.8 63.6% 62.9% 48.4% 58.6% 46.9% 57.5% 44.4% 2013 10/10 0.8 5.3 65.5% 57.3% 37.5% 37.2% 43.2% 50.2% 44.9%
23 2011 56/67 2.2 2.1 70.0% 62.7% 50.3% 56.4% 50.6% 59.0% 48.2% 2014 6/6 0.8 6.8 59.7% 60.9% 48.5% 45.7% 67.1% 56.1% 39.4%
24 2012 18/18 1.1 1.9 74.6% 57.5% 48.1% 47.6% 43.6% 55.2% 46.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 32/33 2.2 3.2 66.8% 63.7% 47.7% 55.2% 53.4% 58.3% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2014 52/61 1.8 2.7 68.3% 61.4% 46.8% 48.8% 51.1% 56.9% 46.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 40/54 1.6 3.1 66.0% 61.4% 50.5% 51.1% 49.4% 57.6% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 38/39 1.9 3.9 64.0% 62.4% 44.9% 48.5% 47.6% 56.1% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 29/33 0.5 3.3 69.4% 56.2% 42.3% 48.1% 42.0% 52.1% 46.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 26/30 1.4 3.8 66.1% 60.2% 47.0% 58.6% 47.7% 55.6% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 35/35 2.0 3.9 63.0% 60.8% 44.2% 50.1% 44.5% 54.7% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1/1 2.0 6.0 63.5% 54.5% 15.8% 14.3% 50.0% 40.4% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 32/32 2.5 3.8 64.5% 60.6% 47.6% 49.0% 50.7% 56.0% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 19/20 2.7 3.5 64.9% 61.1% 44.2% 49.2% 42.7% 55.3% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 452/507 2.1 3.1 66.5% 61.4% 47.3% 52.2% 48.0% 56.6% 45.4% — 108/116 0.7 4.3 65.4% 59.2% 43.2% 45.7% 49.7% 53.9% 44.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Petkovic Ksenia Pervak
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2006 1497 107.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.31 2009 1516 105.5 -0.12 +0.57 0.891 47.4% +19 — — 43.8% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.22
19 2007 1503 107.1 +1.50 +0.78 1.075 51.4% +9 +35 — 35.7% -0.50 1–1 — — +0.06 2010 1541 116.0 -2.10 +0.93 0.958 49.0% +14 -11 — 48.6% -0.16 3–4 (43%) 1–0 — +0.79
20 2008 1501 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.24 2011 1669 118.5 -0.14 +1.89 1.020 50.3% -10 -138 -7 56.2% +0.40 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 105.0 +2.50
21 2009 1614 128.0 +1.55 +1.69 1.118 52.5% -54 +32 — 55.0% +0.52 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.7 +0.67 2012 1588 125.2 -1.50 -1.17 0.930 48.4% +34 -30 — 45.9% -0.45 4–6 (40%) 8–4 (67%) 102.1 -0.15
22 2010 1788 148.0 +2.10 +1.40 1.046 50.9% -23 -95 -103 54.8% +0.44 13–10 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 106.9 -2.09 2013 1595 123.3 -1.89 +0.41 0.903 47.6% +25 — — 40.0% -1.12 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.47
23 2011 1974 155.4 +3.70 +4.59 1.176 53.6% -8 -117 -298 67.6% +1.21 14–6 (70%) 6–5 (55%) 107.7 +0.95 2014 1583 116.3 +1.31 -1.07 0.896 48.0% +19 — — 42.9% -0.57 0–2 2–0 — -0.31
24 2012 1855 137.0 +0.30 +1.98 1.047 50.8% +13 — — 51.3% +0.38 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 100.8 -1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 1802 138.0 +2.53 +2.59 1.133 52.5% +13 +56 — 56.6% +0.67 7–7 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 -1.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2014 1828 145.1 +0.94 +2.73 1.076 51.6% -34 +124 -137 59.4% +0.64 14–7 (67%) 8–7 (53%) 104.6 +0.56 2017 1565 98.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 1690 138.2 -0.26 +3.30 1.069 51.5% +6 +218 +14 52.9% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 5–8 (38%) 95.7 +3.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 1695 134.5 0.00 +1.98 1.029 50.5% +17 +124 +6 52.3% +0.25 6–8 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.2 +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1649 122.9 -3.25 +1.84 0.962 49.0% +30 +25 +34 40.8% -0.36 5–9 (36%) 3–1 (75%) 94.0 +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 1725 133.1 -0.84 +0.44 1.000 50.1% +4 -68 — 52.9% +0.19 6–4 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 102.8 -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 1716 128.9 -1.22 -0.16 0.950 49.1% -1 -46 -56 48.0% -0.12 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 103.2 -0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1700 98.6 -0.48 +2.36 0.665 40.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1730 129.0 -0.07 +1.75 1.016 50.4% -44 +70 -86 47.8% -0.01 4–5 (44%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -2.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1709 124.6 -1.01 -1.99 0.884 47.5% -28 +78 -115 45.2% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 98.7 -1.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1989 144.1 +0.65 +2.02 1.047 51.0% -6 +34 -75 54.0% +0.36 91–79 (54%) 53–55 (49%) 102.0 -0.93 — 1702 124.3 -0.93 +0.43 0.957 49.0% +14 -72 -7 49.0% -0.22 18–19 (49%) 18–8 (69%) 106.5 +1.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.