H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andrea Petkovic vs Ksenia Pervak H2H: 1-1
Andrea Petkovic and Ksenia Pervak are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ksenia Pervak leads 1–0 on grass, while Andrea Petkovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Petkovic won the 2012 Luxembourg quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 35
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2012* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Andrea Petkovic | 6-3 6-2 | Ksenia Pervak | Match data |
| Jun 26, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Ksenia Pervak | 6-4 7-6(2) | Andrea Petkovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Petkovic | #139 | #9 | 4,640 | 1,990 | 273 | 225 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| Ksenia Pervak | #834 | #37 | 1,475 | 1,703 | 53 | 63 | 45.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Petkovic | Ksenia Pervak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #129 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #97 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #39 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2009 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2011 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #10 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #43 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,826 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #24 | 1,685 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #99 | 1,631 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,712 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,730 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |