H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andrea Petkovic vs Na Li H2H: 0-1
Na Li holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Petkovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Na Li leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Na Li won the 2011 Australian Open quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2011* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Na Li | 6-2 6-4 | Andrea Petkovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Petkovic | #139 | #9 | 4,640 | 1,990 | 273 | 225 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| Na Li | #9 | #2 | 7,585 | 2,124 | 334 | 155 | 68.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Petkovic | Na Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 6–1 | 85.7% | #78 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2011 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #10 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #56 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #21 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2013 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #43 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #29 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,826 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #24 | 1,685 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #11 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2017 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #99 | 1,631 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #5 | 1,868 | 1 | 5 |
| 30 | 2018 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #7 | 2,016 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,712 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #3 | 2,077 | 1 | 7 |
| 32 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 29–7 | 80.6% | #9 | 2,031 | 2 | 9 |
| 33 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,730 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |