H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Andrea Petkovic vs Serena Williams H2H: 0-5

Serena Williams holds a 5–0 lead over Andrea Petkovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2015 Toronto fourth round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Petkovic
GER Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 5
5 main draw meetings
Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 14, 2015* Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Serena Williams #1 6-3 6-2 Andrea Petkovic #16 Match data
Aug 2, 2014* Stanford WTA 500 SF Hard Serena Williams #1 7-5 6-0 Andrea Petkovic #18 Match data
May 15, 2014* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Serena Williams #1 6-2 6-2 Andrea Petkovic #28 Match data
Jan 3, 2014* Brisbane WTA 500 R16 Hard Serena Williams #1 6-4 6-4 Andrea Petkovic #43 Match data
May 7, 2010* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Serena Williams #1 6-2 3-6 6-0 Andrea Petkovic #49 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrea Petkovic #139 #9 4,640 1,990 273 225 54.8% 0 0 1 3 3 7
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Petkovic Serena Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4
18 2006 0–1 0.0% #242 1,497 0 0 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7
19 2007 2–4 33.3% #93 1,502 0 0 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10
20 2008 0–1 0.0% #378 1,500 0 0 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18
21 2009 11–8 57.9% #55 1,613 0 1 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22
22 2010 33–24 57.9% #32 1,796 0 1 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24
23 2011 50–17 74.6% #10 1,975 0 2 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25
24 2012 9–9 50.0% #125 1,857 0 2 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25
25 2013 19–14 57.6% #43 1,798 0 2 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27
26 2014 39–22 63.9% #13 1,826 0 5 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31
27 2015 29–25 53.7% #24 1,685 0 6 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34
28 2016 19–19 50.0% #55 1,702 0 6 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36
29 2017 9–20 31.0% #99 1,631 0 6 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38
30 2018 13–13 50.0% #64 1,700 0 6 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44
31 2019 16–19 45.7% #78 1,712 0 6 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55
32 2020 0–1 0.0% #102 1,697 0 6 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62
33 2021 16–16 50.0% #75 1,730 0 7 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67
34 2022 8–12 40.0% #139 1,707 0 7 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69
35 — — — — — — — 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70
36 — — — — — — — 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70
37 — — — — — — — 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70
38 — — — — — — — 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71
39 — — — — — — — 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71
40 — — — — — — — 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71
44 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71