H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Andrea Petkovic vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 1-0
Andrea Petkovic holds a 1–0 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Petkovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Petkovic won the 2011 San Diego fourth round 6-2 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2011* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Andrea Petkovic | 6-2 3-0 (ret.) | Virginie Razzano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Petkovic | #139 | #9 | 4,640 | 1,990 | 273 | 225 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| Virginie Razzano | #1,226 | #16 | 2,420 | 1,876 | 200 | 216 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Petkovic | Virginie Razzano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #344 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #143 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #60 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #51 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #10 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #28 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2013 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #43 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #58 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2014 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,826 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #19 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #24 | 1,685 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,681 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2017 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #99 | 1,631 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2018 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #99 | 1,683 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,712 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #200 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,730 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |