H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Andrea Petkovic vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 1-0

Andrea Petkovic holds a 1–0 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Petkovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Petkovic won the 2011 San Diego round of 16 6-2 3-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Petkovic
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Virginie Razzano
France Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Petkovic #11 6-2 3-0 (ret.) Virginie Razzano #73 Match data Aug 5, 2011* R16 San Diego Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Petkovic #139 #9 4,640 1,988 279 228 55.0% 0 0 1 2 4 7
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,854 201 217 48.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Petkovic Virginie Razzano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,481 0 0
18 2006 0–1 0.0% #242 1,497 0 0 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,578 0 0
19 2007 2–4 33.3% #93 1,502 0 0 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,657 0 0
20 2008 0–1 0.0% #378 1,500 0 0 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,612 0 0
21 2009 11–8 57.9% #55 1,614 0 1 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,593 0 0
22 2010 33–24 57.9% #32 1,787 0 1 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,606 0 0
23 2011 50–17 74.6% #10 1,973 0 2 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,593 0 0
24 2012 9–9 50.0% #125 1,855 0 2 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,806 0 2
25 2013 19–14 57.6% #43 1,801 0 2 2008 15–21 41.7% #58 1,634 0 2
26 2014 39–22 63.9% #13 1,828 0 5 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,788 0 2
27 2015 29–25 53.7% #24 1,689 0 6 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,655 0 2
28 2016 19–20 48.7% #55 1,694 0 6 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,680 0 2
29 2017 12–21 36.4% #99 1,648 0 6 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,632 0 2
30 2018 16–14 53.3% #64 1,725 0 6 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,682 0 2
31 2019 16–19 45.7% #78 1,716 0 6 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,620 0 2
32 2020 0–1 0.0% #102 1,700 0 6 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,656 0 2
33 2021 16–16 50.0% #75 1,729 0 7 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,646 0 2
34 2022 8–12 40.0% #139 1,708 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Petkovic Virginie Razzano
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 2007 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 5 9 14 35.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2009 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 2010 21 14 35 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 2005 4 10 14 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2011 33 10 43 76.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 8 9 17 47.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2012 8 8 16 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 28 11 39 71.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2013 12 9 21 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2014 15 14 29 51.7% 19 5 24 79.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2009 15 12 27 55.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2015 19 18 37 51.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2010 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2017 10 12 22 45.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2018 13 9 22 59.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2019 10 11 21 47.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2014 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2020 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
33 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — —
34 2022 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 170 142 312 54.5% 79 57 136 58.1% 24 26 50 48.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — 109 116 225 48.4% 64 67 131 48.9% 23 23 46 50.0% 5 11 16 31.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 452/505 of Andrea Petkovic's and 249/365 of Virginie Razzano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrea Petkovic Virginie Razzano
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2007 3/6 1.7 2.3 72.7% 59.0% 67.8% 57.1% 38.9% 60.9% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 5/35 0.8 3.8 63.9% 64.9% 39.5% 53.6% 53.7% 55.6% 50.3%
21 2009 18/19 3.1 2.5 64.4% 64.3% 48.7% 51.8% 45.7% 58.4% 46.5% 2004 5/15 1.0 6.2 60.8% 62.6% 43.1% 56.8% 61.8% 55.3% 40.7%
22 2010 53/57 3.9 2.8 63.6% 62.9% 48.4% 58.6% 46.9% 57.5% 44.4% 2005 12/38 1.3 5.5 64.0% 63.5% 42.1% 57.4% 44.1% 55.3% 44.0%
23 2011 56/67 2.2 2.1 70.0% 62.7% 50.3% 56.4% 50.6% 59.0% 48.2% 2006 20/28 1.0 4.6 66.9% 59.4% 45.1% 57.2% 45.7% 54.6% 40.7%
24 2012 18/18 1.1 1.9 74.6% 57.5% 48.1% 47.6% 43.6% 55.2% 46.9% 2007 30/54 1.8 4.6 64.7% 61.1% 43.5% 53.3% 50.7% 55.0% 45.1%
25 2013 32/33 2.2 3.2 66.8% 63.7% 47.7% 55.2% 53.4% 58.3% 47.2% 2008 30/36 1.9 4.5 64.0% 61.1% 43.0% 55.7% 50.1% 54.5% 44.0%
26 2014 52/61 1.8 2.7 68.3% 61.4% 46.8% 48.8% 51.1% 56.9% 46.4% 2009 47/51 1.8 3.5 64.6% 63.0% 48.1% 53.6% 45.8% 57.8% 43.8%
27 2015 40/54 1.6 3.1 66.0% 61.4% 50.5% 51.1% 49.4% 57.6% 45.3% 2010 23/24 2.1 4.1 64.6% 59.7% 41.3% 49.3% 54.3% 53.2% 42.9%
28 2016 38/39 1.9 3.9 64.0% 62.4% 44.9% 48.5% 47.6% 56.1% 45.2% 2011 25/26 1.8 4.2 65.7% 62.1% 42.1% 51.7% 50.1% 55.2% 43.5%
29 2017 29/33 0.5 3.3 69.4% 56.2% 42.3% 48.1% 42.0% 52.1% 46.1% 2012 13/14 1.5 3.5 62.9% 59.8% 41.7% 56.8% 54.0% 53.0% 41.7%
30 2018 26/30 1.4 3.8 66.1% 60.2% 47.0% 58.6% 47.7% 55.6% 44.4% 2013 13/17 1.9 4.6 66.1% 63.1% 48.1% 61.1% 46.5% 57.6% 42.1%
31 2019 35/35 2.0 3.9 63.0% 60.8% 44.2% 50.1% 44.5% 54.7% 43.1% 2014 11/12 2.1 2.9 71.3% 61.8% 41.6% 54.4% 55.4% 55.9% 43.7%
32 2020 1/1 2.0 6.0 63.5% 54.5% 15.8% 14.3% 50.0% 40.4% 39.7% 2015 6/6 1.0 4.7 73.6% 58.7% 52.3% 53.1% 55.2% 57.9% 45.5%
33 2021 32/32 2.5 3.8 64.5% 60.6% 47.6% 49.0% 50.7% 56.0% 44.7% 2016 9/9 2.4 4.7 64.7% 62.8% 37.8% 49.2% 55.4% 53.8% 45.0%
34 2022 19/20 2.7 3.5 64.9% 61.1% 44.2% 49.2% 42.7% 55.3% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 452/507 2.1 3.1 66.5% 61.4% 47.3% 52.2% 48.0% 56.6% 45.4% — 249/418 1.7 4.2 65.2% 61.6% 44.0% 54.2% 50.0% 55.4% 43.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Petkovic Virginie Razzano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1484 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.23
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1481 108.1 — — — — — +65 — 40.0% -0.53 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 +0.38
18 2006 1497 107.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.31 2001 1579 126.2 — — — — -34 -3 +66 44.4% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 103.6 -0.70
19 2007 1503 107.1 +1.50 +0.78 1.075 51.4% +9 +35 — 35.7% -0.50 1–1 — — +0.06 2002 1658 129.3 — — — — -42 -61 — 48.1% -0.35 3–3 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 103.2 -2.19
20 2008 1501 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.24 2003 1613 121.0 -0.21 +2.36 1.133 52.9% -31 +1 +72 45.6% -0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 103.5 -0.11
21 2009 1614 128.0 +1.55 +1.69 1.118 52.5% -54 +32 — 55.0% +0.52 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.7 +0.67 2004 1594 104.5 -0.89 -1.63 0.911 48.4% -36 -11 +105 46.9% -0.69 1–3 (25%) 3–0 (100%) 100.4 +0.44
22 2010 1788 148.0 +2.10 +1.40 1.046 50.9% -23 -95 -103 54.8% +0.44 13–10 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 106.9 -2.09 2005 1606 127.3 +0.37 +0.22 0.983 49.8% -74 +84 +60 41.2% -0.66 8–5 (62%) 3–8 (27%) 100.4 -0.08
23 2011 1974 155.4 +3.70 +4.59 1.176 53.6% -8 -117 -298 67.6% +1.21 14–6 (70%) 6–5 (55%) 107.7 +0.95 2006 1594 129.9 -0.29 -1.94 0.897 48.2% +18 +21 — 40.9% -0.50 3–7 (30%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85
24 2012 1855 137.0 +0.30 +1.98 1.047 50.8% +13 — — 51.3% +0.38 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 100.8 -1.34 2007 1806 138.8 -0.54 +0.52 1.003 50.2% +49 -251 — 61.9% +0.91 9–4 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 109.3 +0.70
25 2013 1802 138.0 +2.53 +2.59 1.133 52.5% +13 +56 — 56.6% +0.67 7–7 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 -1.81 2008 1635 123.8 -0.44 -0.24 0.968 49.5% +52 -83 -67 45.1% -0.35 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 +0.98
26 2014 1828 145.1 +0.94 +2.73 1.076 51.6% -34 +124 -137 59.4% +0.64 14–7 (67%) 8–7 (53%) 104.6 +0.56 2009 1789 138.2 +2.43 +0.57 1.037 51.0% -69 -109 -67 54.9% +0.62 8–4 (67%) 5–9 (36%) 100.1 -0.77
27 2015 1690 138.2 -0.26 +3.30 1.069 51.5% +6 +218 +14 52.9% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 5–8 (38%) 95.7 +3.27 2010 1655 119.8 -2.12 -0.81 0.917 48.1% -4 -39 — 41.5% -0.92 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — -0.13
28 2016 1695 134.5 0.00 +1.98 1.029 50.5% +17 +124 +6 52.3% +0.25 6–8 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.2 +0.16 2011 1681 123.8 +0.20 +0.19 0.970 49.6% -1 -65 -3 51.9% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 105.2 -0.70
29 2017 1649 122.9 -3.25 +1.84 0.962 49.0% +30 +25 +34 40.8% -0.36 5–9 (36%) 3–1 (75%) 94.0 +0.52 2012 1633 114.8 -1.74 -0.90 0.889 47.6% +11 +12 +24 39.3% -0.86 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.93
30 2018 1725 133.1 -0.84 +0.44 1.000 50.1% +4 -68 — 52.9% +0.19 6–4 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 102.8 -0.49 2013 1682 127.1 +0.95 -0.89 0.992 50.1% -10 -7 — 51.3% +0.31 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 -0.32
31 2019 1716 128.9 -1.22 -0.16 0.950 49.1% -1 -46 -56 48.0% -0.12 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 103.2 -0.57 2014 1621 106.8 -0.91 +0.76 0.992 49.8% +5 +39 -17 41.4% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 96.7 -0.40
32 2020 1700 98.6 -0.48 +2.36 0.665 40.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.03 2015 1656 110.4 +0.27 +1.25 1.081 51.4% — +28 — 75.0% +2.13 2–0 — — -0.16
33 2021 1730 129.0 -0.07 +1.75 1.016 50.4% -44 +70 -86 47.8% -0.01 4–5 (44%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -2.21 2016 1646 107.5 -0.91 +0.91 0.973 49.6% — +40 — 47.6% +0.19 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — -0.64
34 2022 1709 124.6 -1.01 -1.99 0.884 47.5% -28 +78 -115 45.2% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 98.7 -1.76 2017 1581 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1572 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1989 144.1 +0.65 +2.02 1.047 51.0% -6 +34 -75 54.0% +0.36 91–79 (54%) 53–55 (49%) 102.0 -0.93 — 1855 132.0 +0.03 -0.04 0.978 49.7% -7 -34 +14 48.1% -0.12 66–62 (52%) 57–52 (52%) 104.4 -1.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.