H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Andrea Sestini Hlavackova vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 0-1
Iveta Benesova holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Sestini Hlavackova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Iveta Benesova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Iveta Benesova won the 2005 Prague third round 5-7 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 43
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2005* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Iveta Benesova | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | #602 | #58 | 1,055 | 1,641 | 37 | 62 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Iveta Benesova | #671 | #25 | 1,811 | 1,760 | 177 | 221 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | Iveta Benesova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #132 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #36 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #58 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #38 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2014 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #166 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #59 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2015 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #54 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2016 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #284 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #480 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #671 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |