H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Andrea Sestini Hlavackova vs Nicole Gibbs H2H: 0-1
Nicole Gibbs holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Sestini Hlavackova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Gibbs leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Gibbs won the 2014 Monterrey third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2014* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Nicole Gibbs | 6-3 6-4 | Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | #602 | #58 | 1,055 | 1,641 | 37 | 62 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicole Gibbs | #175 | #68 | 946 | 1,692 | 37 | 60 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | Nicole Gibbs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #109 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #89 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #109 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #123 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #126 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #166 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2016 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #284 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #480 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |