H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Andrea Sestini Hlavackova vs Tsvetana Pironkova H2H: 0-1
Tsvetana Pironkova holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Sestini Hlavackova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tsvetana Pironkova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tsvetana Pironkova won the 2014 Katowice third round 4-6 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2014* | Katowice | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Tsvetana Pironkova | 4-6 7-5 6-1 | Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | #602 | #58 | 1,055 | 1,641 | 37 | 62 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tsvetana Pironkova | #1,170 | #31 | 1,805 | 1,770 | 169 | 222 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | Tsvetana Pironkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #86 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #64 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #95 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #44 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #97 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #46 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #42 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #38 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2014 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #166 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #59 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2015 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2016 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #284 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #480 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #136 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #252 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |