H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anett Kontaveit vs Jana Cepelova H2H: 1-1
Anett Kontaveit and Jana Cepelova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jana Cepelova leads 1–0 on clay, while Anett Kontaveit leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anett Kontaveit won the 2017 Luxembourg third round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
EST
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 33
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2017* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Anett Kontaveit | 6-0 6-2 | Jana Cepelova | Match data |
| Jul 18, 2014* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Jana Cepelova | 6-4 6-3 | Anett Kontaveit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anett Kontaveit | #81 | #2 | 4,721 | 2,109 | 205 | 138 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Jana Cepelova | #894 | #50 | 1,074 | 1,685 | 55 | 91 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anett Kontaveit | Jana Cepelova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #112 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #34 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #56 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #20 | 1,832 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #23 | 1,912 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #108 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #188 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #17 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #158 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |