H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Anett Kontaveit holds a 2–1 lead over Monica Puig in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anett Kontaveit leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anett Kontaveit won the 2019 Indian Wells Open second round 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anett Kontaveit | 6-3 7-6(4) | Monica Puig | Match data | Mar 9, 2019* | R64 | Indian Wells Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Anett Kontaveit | 2-6 7-5 6-1 | Monica Puig | Match data | Jan 9, 2019* | R32 | Sydney International | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Monica Puig | 6-4 6-3 | Anett Kontaveit | Match data | Aug 23, 2018* | R16 | New Haven | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | Olympics | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anett Kontaveit | #81 | #2 | 4,721 | 2,114 | 205 | 140 | 59.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Monica Puig | #1,073 | #27 | 1,570 | 1,843 | 139 | 140 | 49.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anett Kontaveit | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #56 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #112 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #59 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #34 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #92 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #20 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #32 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2019 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #26 | 1,875 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #58 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #23 | 1,870 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #53 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 49–18 | 73.1% | #7 | 2,058 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #79 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #17 | 1,886 | 0 | 6 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,623 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,779 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1073 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Anett Kontaveit | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2012 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2013 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 20 | 2016 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2014 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 21 | 2017 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | 2015 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 22 | 2018 | 19 | 15 | 34 | 55.9% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2016 | 25 | 14 | 39 | 64.1% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% |
| 23 | 2019 | 17 | 10 | 27 | 63.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2017 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2020 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 58.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2021 | 40 | 13 | 53 | 75.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2019 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 26 | 2022 | 22 | 11 | 33 | 66.7% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 139 | 91 | 230 | 60.4% | 46 | 33 | 79 | 58.2% | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% | — | 91 | 94 | 185 | 49.2% | 34 | 30 | 64 | 53.1% | 14 | 16 | 30 | 46.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 327/346 of Anett Kontaveit's and 252/279 of Monica Puig's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Anett Kontaveit | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 60.7% | 43.2% | 37.5% | 53.8% | 100.0% | 41.0% | 34.2% | 2011 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 59.8% | 64.5% | 41.2% | 53.8% | 50.0% | 55.1% | 45.8% |
| 18 | 2014 | 5/6 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 60.9% | 61.7% | 40.9% | 41.7% | 44.7% | 53.1% | 43.9% | 2012 | 1/2 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 50.0% | 62.5% | 53.1% | 75.0% | 0.0% | 57.8% | 30.0% |
| 19 | 2015 | 5/11 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 57.9% | 51.5% | 44.8% | 28.1% | 34.6% | 48.4% | 40.1% | 2013 | 27/28 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 62.4% | 62.4% | 51.4% | 41.8% | 51.2% | 58.1% | 43.0% |
| 20 | 2016 | 29/30 | 4.3 | 4.8 | 58.9% | 66.1% | 45.4% | 54.5% | 51.5% | 57.6% | 42.4% | 2014 | 33/34 | 3.1 | 4.4 | 59.8% | 66.4% | 46.7% | 51.1% | 46.9% | 58.4% | 42.7% |
| 21 | 2017 | 45/45 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 64.0% | 68.8% | 48.4% | 54.2% | 44.0% | 61.4% | 44.3% | 2015 | 32/38 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 60.7% | 65.2% | 51.0% | 50.2% | 49.1% | 59.4% | 38.4% |
| 22 | 2018 | 55/56 | 3.1 | 3.8 | 62.3% | 63.8% | 46.6% | 57.8% | 51.1% | 57.4% | 44.9% | 2016 | 52/65 | 3.1 | 3.6 | 62.0% | 64.8% | 49.8% | 58.7% | 46.5% | 59.0% | 44.7% |
| 23 | 2019 | 38/42 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 63.1% | 66.8% | 48.3% | 61.3% | 45.3% | 59.5% | 43.2% | 2017 | 39/41 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 60.1% | 65.6% | 47.8% | 54.0% | 45.1% | 58.7% | 42.8% |
| 24 | 2020 | 31/31 | 3.5 | 2.3 | 62.2% | 67.6% | 48.2% | 53.1% | 53.1% | 60.2% | 45.4% | 2018 | 31/32 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 61.3% | 67.1% | 45.7% | 52.7% | 48.6% | 58.6% | 42.1% |
| 25 | 2021 | 61/67 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 60.7% | 69.7% | 50.2% | 56.4% | 53.2% | 62.2% | 45.8% | 2019 | 33/35 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 62.5% | 66.1% | 48.0% | 60.1% | 51.9% | 59.1% | 44.1% |
| 26 | 2022 | 45/45 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 63.2% | 66.5% | 47.4% | 54.5% | 47.5% | 59.6% | 44.4% | 2020 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 6.0 | 64.6% | 55.7% | 28.2% | 29.8% | 28.6% | 46.0% | 34.8% |
| 27 | 2023 | 12/12 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 62.4% | 64.4% | 43.0% | 46.1% | 37.2% | 56.3% | 40.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 60.3% | 51.2% | 33.3% | 53.8% | 33.3% | 44.1% | 32.7% |
| Career | — | 327/346 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 62.0% | 66.6% | 47.6% | 55.1% | 48.9% | 59.4% | 44.2% | — | 252/279 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 61.2% | 65.2% | 48.4% | 53.3% | 47.8% | 58.6% | 42.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Anett Kontaveit | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1491 | 98.3 | -2.83 | -0.54 | 0.580 | 38.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.08 | 2011 | 1492 | 103.5 | -1.04 | -2.47 | 1.020 | 50.6% | — | — | — | 33.3% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.15 |
| 18 | 2014 | 1466 | 100.3 | -0.85 | +0.51 | 0.936 | 48.5% | — | +74 | — | 28.6% | -1.21 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | -0.11 | 2012 | 1464 | 94.8 | -3.46 | -3.96 | 0.711 | 44.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.17 |
| 19 | 2015 | 1517 | 109.4 | -3.04 | -1.00 | 0.776 | 44.4% | +23 | — | — | 45.8% | -0.63 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.14 | 2013 | 1571 | 123.3 | +1.46 | -0.93 | 1.027 | 50.5% | -93 | +68 | +69 | 50.0% | 0.00 | 3–7 (30%) | 5–3 (63%) | 101.7 | +0.09 |
| 20 | 2016 | 1607 | 127.5 | +1.62 | -0.14 | 1.002 | 50.4% | -2 | -120 | -30 | 50.0% | +0.26 | 3–7 (30%) | 3–7 (30%) | 93.8 | -2.22 | 2014 | 1615 | 129.5 | +1.33 | -0.33 | 1.027 | 50.6% | -75 | +119 | 0 | 48.7% | +0.15 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–3 (57%) | 102.0 | -0.29 |
| 21 | 2017 | 1706 | 137.6 | +4.48 | +1.12 | 1.147 | 52.5% | -91 | +30 | +30 | 56.2% | +0.75 | 8–7 (53%) | 7–9 (44%) | 101.7 | -0.81 | 2015 | 1579 | 121.9 | +0.62 | -2.26 | 0.948 | 49.1% | +9 | +55 | -13 | 42.4% | -0.19 | 3–8 (27%) | 5–11 (31%) | 91.9 | -0.38 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1837 | 141.9 | +0.78 | +2.24 | 1.053 | 51.3% | -76 | +49 | -138 | 53.4% | +0.30 | 15–8 (65%) | 10–5 (67%) | 110.5 | +1.22 | 2016 | 1771 | 137.9 | +2.19 | +1.46 | 1.092 | 52.0% | -9 | -57 | -89 | 58.9% | +0.70 | 12–5 (71%) | 3–4 (43%) | 108.8 | -0.14 |
| 23 | 2019 | 1876 | 145.7 | +2.85 | +1.08 | 1.066 | 51.5% | +36 | -18 | -176 | 51.8% | +0.09 | 9–4 (69%) | 7–5 (58%) | 105.5 | -0.95 | 2017 | 1724 | 133.3 | +2.17 | -0.36 | 1.036 | 50.7% | +15 | -63 | — | 47.4% | -0.04 | 8–9 (47%) | 5–3 (63%) | 101.4 | -0.88 |
| 24 | 2020 | 1871 | 153.1 | +2.99 | +1.93 | 1.143 | 52.9% | +44 | -8 | — | 61.6% | +1.01 | 6–5 (55%) | 4–2 (67%) | 99.9 | +0.31 | 2018 | 1780 | 137.8 | +0.96 | +0.23 | 1.017 | 50.5% | +6 | — | — | 56.5% | +0.25 | 6–5 (55%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.8 | -0.76 |
| 25 | 2021 | 2058 | 162.0 | +5.54 | +3.36 | 1.211 | 54.0% | +27 | -175 | -286 | 69.2% | +1.24 | 10–7 (59%) | 5–3 (63%) | 101.7 | -1.91 | 2019 | 1686 | 127.3 | +1.69 | +0.90 | 1.076 | 51.5% | -34 | +39 | -64 | 50.0% | +0.35 | 4–8 (33%) | 3–6 (33%) | 92.6 | -0.89 |
| 26 | 2022 | 1886 | 151.2 | +2.51 | +1.53 | 1.100 | 52.0% | +86 | +5 | — | 61.2% | +0.68 | 8–6 (57%) | 4–4 (50%) | 99.1 | +0.40 | 2020 | 1624 | 94.4 | -0.47 | -3.91 | 0.644 | 40.5% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -3.40 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.30 |
| 27 | 2023 | 1779 | 114.3 | -0.99 | -1.11 | 0.919 | 48.2% | +118 | +17 | — | 40.0% | -0.68 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1619 | 101.3 | +0.44 | +1.01 | 0.584 | 39.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.14 |
| Career | — | 2114 | 150.2 | +2.78 | +1.61 | 1.089 | 51.8% | +11 | -6 | -112 | 56.8% | +0.53 | 61–49 (55%) | 42–39 (52%) | 103.2 | -1.15 | — | 1843 | 134.9 | +1.52 | -0.09 | 1.029 | 50.7% | -18 | +21 | -39 | 50.3% | +0.16 | 40–50 (44%) | 29–34 (46%) | 100.5 | -1.10 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sakkari | 6 | 5 | 11 | Feb 13, 2022 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 3 | 5 | 8 | Sep 25, 2021 | H2H |
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 10, 2021 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 5 | 1 | 6 | Apr 21, 2022 | H2H |
| Katerina Siniakova | 5 | 1 | 6 | Jan 19, 2022 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha Stosur | 3 | 4 | 7 | Mar 22, 2018 | H2H |
| Julia Goerges | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 19, 2019 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 24, 2019 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 27, 2018 | H2H |
| Carla Suárez Navarro | 1 | 5 | 6 | Aug 24, 2018 | H2H |