H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Anett Kontaveit vs Venus Williams H2H: 2-2

Anett Kontaveit and Venus Williams are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anett Kontaveit leads 2–1 on clay, while Venus Williams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anett Kontaveit won the 2018 Rome fourth round 6-2 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anett Kontaveit
EST Age 30 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 18, 2018* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Anett Kontaveit #26 6-2 7-6(3) Venus Williams #9 Match data
May 7, 2018 Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Anett Kontaveit #29 3-6 6-3 6-2 Venus Williams #8 Match data
May 24, 2016* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Venus Williams #11 7-6(5) 7-6(4) Anett Kontaveit #82 Match data
Sep 8, 2015* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Venus Williams #23 6-2 6-1 Anett Kontaveit #152 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anett Kontaveit #81 #2 4,721 2,109 205 138 59.8% 0 0 0 3 3 6
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anett Kontaveit Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2013 0–1 0.0% #249 1,491 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2014 1–5 16.7% #159 1,466 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2015 5–6 45.5% #91 1,517 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2016 13–16 44.8% #112 1,609 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2017 26–19 57.8% #34 1,706 0 1 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2018 33–23 58.9% #20 1,832 0 1 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2019 24–16 60.0% #26 1,865 0 1 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2020 21–11 65.6% #23 1,912 0 1 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2021 49–17 74.2% #7 2,049 0 5 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2022 29–16 64.4% #17 1,882 0 6 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2023 4–8 33.3% #81 1,776 0 6 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 — — — — — — — 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 — — — — — — — 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 — — — — — — — 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47