H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Angelique Kerber and Caroline Wozniacki are tied 8–8 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 16 main-draw meetings, Caroline Wozniacki leads 7–5 on hard courts, while Angelique Kerber leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Caroline Wozniacki won the 2024 Indian Wells Open fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Wozniacki | 6-4 6-2 | Angelique Kerber | Match data | Mar 13, 2024* | R16 | Indian Wells Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | Angelique Kerber | Match data | Jun 25, 2018 | SF | Eastbourne Open | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Grass |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 7-6(4) 1-6 6-3 | Angelique Kerber | Match data | Feb 17, 2018* | QF | Qatar Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Angelique Kerber | 6-4 6-3 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data | Sep 10, 2016* | SF | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Angelique Kerber | 6-2 6-3 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data | Oct 8, 2015* | R16 | China Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | Angelique Kerber | Match data | Sep 26, 2015* | QF | Pan Pacific Open | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Angelique Kerber | 3-6 6-1 7-5 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data | Apr 26, 2015* | F | Porsche Tennis Grand Prix | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Clay |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 7-5 6-2 | Angelique Kerber | Match data | Aug 15, 2014* | R16 | Cincinnati Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Angelique Kerber | 3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data | Jun 21, 2014* | SF | Eastbourne Open | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Grass |
| Angelique Kerber | 6-4 7-6(5) | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data | Sep 28, 2013* | SF | Pan Pacific Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 2-6 6-4 7-5 | Angelique Kerber | Match data | Mar 13, 2013* | SF | Indian Wells Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Angelique Kerber | 6-1 2-6 6-4 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data | Oct 5, 2012* | R16 | China Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Angelique Kerber | 6-1 6-2 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data | Apr 27, 2012* | R16 | Porsche Tennis Grand Prix | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Clay |
| Angelique Kerber | 6-4 6-4 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data | Apr 15, 2012* | F | Copenhagen | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Angelique Kerber | Match data | Jun 10, 2011* | R16 | Copenhagen | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 6-3 6-4 | Angelique Kerber | Match data | Jul 31, 2008* | R32 | Stockholm | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelique Kerber | #205 | #1 | 9,080 | 2,055 | 477 | 277 | 63.3% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 14 |
| Caroline Wozniacki | #289 | #1 | 10,255 | 2,154 | 620 | 275 | 69.3% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 11 | 30 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Angelique Kerber | Caroline Wozniacki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #12 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 2007 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 2,105 | 0 | 12 |
| 20 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 1,988 | 0 | 18 |
| 21 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #10 | 1,975 | 0 | 20 |
| 22 | 2010 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,906 | 0 | 21 |
| 23 | 2011 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #32 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,014 | 0 | 22 |
| 24 | 2012 | 60–21 | 74.1% | #5 | 1,978 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,817 | 0 | 23 |
| 25 | 2013 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,944 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,912 | 0 | 25 |
| 26 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,894 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 60–22 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,004 | 0 | 27 |
| 27 | 2015 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #10 | 1,924 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #3 | 1,947 | 1 | 30 |
| 28 | 2016 | 60–19 | 75.9% | #1 | 2,033 | 2 | 10 | 2019 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #38 | 1,845 | 1 | 30 |
| 29 | 2017 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #21 | 1,770 | 2 | 10 | 2020 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #36 | 1,852 | 1 | 30 |
| 30 | 2018 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #2 | 1,934 | 3 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #20 | 1,806 | 3 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,769 | 3 | 12 | 2023 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #249 | 1,862 | 1 | 30 |
| 33 | 2021 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #16 | 1,936 | 3 | 13 | 2024 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #70 | 1,845 | 1 | 30 |
| 34 | 2022 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,880 | 3 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #205 | 1,830 | 3 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Angelique Kerber | Caroline Wozniacki | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 42 | 13 | 55 | 76.4% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2006 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 35 | 18 | 53 | 66.0% | 23 | 6 | 29 | 79.3% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 45 | 9 | 54 | 83.3% | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 40 | 11 | 51 | 78.4% | 20 | 5 | 25 | 80.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 42 | 14 | 56 | 75.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 34 | 14 | 48 | 70.8% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2014 | 42 | 15 | 57 | 73.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 31 | 14 | 45 | 68.9% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% | 2015 | 26 | 17 | 43 | 60.5% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 35 | 17 | 52 | 67.3% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 31 | 14 | 45 | 68.9% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 29 | 14 | 43 | 67.4% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2017 | 41 | 14 | 55 | 74.5% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 28 | 17 | 45 | 62.2% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 26 | 12 | 38 | 68.4% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 44 | 12 | 56 | 78.6% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 21 | 17 | 38 | 55.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 28 | 12 | 40 | 70.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 19 | 14 | 33 | 57.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 11 | 2 | 13 | 84.6% | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 296 | 176 | 472 | 62.7% | 90 | 65 | 155 | 58.1% | 85 | 34 | 119 | 71.4% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | 447 | 188 | 635 | 70.4% | 111 | 59 | 170 | 65.3% | 62 | 28 | 90 | 68.9% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 672/754 of Angelique Kerber's and 788/893 of Caroline Wozniacki's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Angelique Kerber | Caroline Wozniacki | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3/8 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 65.7% | 58.9% | 51.0% | 43.9% | 42.3% | 56.6% | 49.3% |
| 16 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 18/27 | 1.1 | 3.2 | 67.3% | 56.6% | 40.0% | 54.4% | 45.4% | 51.4% | 41.8% |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 63/73 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 65.9% | 65.6% | 50.8% | 58.8% | 54.4% | 60.4% | 49.1% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 86/91 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 68.9% | 64.2% | 50.0% | 52.2% | 49.6% | 59.7% | 48.6% |
| 19 | 2007 | 15/16 | 0.5 | 3.7 | 62.3% | 62.0% | 42.2% | 43.7% | 48.4% | 54.8% | 42.3% | 2010 | 71/80 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 68.9% | 65.3% | 50.2% | 59.5% | 50.1% | 60.6% | 48.1% |
| 20 | 2008 | 17/21 | 0.9 | 3.0 | 66.6% | 56.4% | 40.9% | 45.9% | 45.4% | 51.0% | 46.3% | 2011 | 73/80 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 70.6% | 65.6% | 51.4% | 58.1% | 53.0% | 61.5% | 51.1% |
| 21 | 2009 | 9/9 | 1.0 | 4.2 | 66.0% | 58.4% | 39.8% | 42.7% | 56.5% | 51.7% | 44.4% | 2012 | 60/71 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 66.8% | 63.6% | 51.4% | 59.5% | 52.9% | 59.4% | 47.5% |
| 22 | 2010 | 38/42 | 1.7 | 3.4 | 62.9% | 63.0% | 43.8% | 49.4% | 51.5% | 55.9% | 46.2% | 2013 | 56/63 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 69.1% | 62.5% | 50.3% | 59.3% | 54.1% | 58.9% | 47.5% |
| 23 | 2011 | 35/37 | 1.5 | 3.7 | 62.1% | 62.7% | 44.6% | 54.1% | 51.4% | 55.9% | 47.4% | 2014 | 61/68 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 69.6% | 66.0% | 48.0% | 58.7% | 53.3% | 60.4% | 48.1% |
| 24 | 2012 | 69/81 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 64.7% | 65.8% | 50.1% | 56.8% | 51.8% | 60.0% | 46.3% | 2015 | 51/62 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 69.9% | 65.3% | 52.6% | 50.4% | 51.3% | 61.5% | 46.7% |
| 25 | 2013 | 65/67 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 62.2% | 65.8% | 48.3% | 54.4% | 51.2% | 59.4% | 47.1% | 2016 | 44/52 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 67.7% | 66.5% | 46.3% | 57.0% | 56.3% | 59.9% | 47.8% |
| 26 | 2014 | 62/65 | 1.7 | 3.0 | 65.9% | 63.7% | 45.4% | 57.8% | 48.6% | 57.3% | 47.2% | 2017 | 76/82 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 67.6% | 65.7% | 49.4% | 56.8% | 51.6% | 60.2% | 47.8% |
| 27 | 2015 | 53/73 | 1.3 | 2.2 | 70.2% | 64.1% | 50.9% | 52.5% | 50.1% | 60.0% | 46.2% | 2018 | 50/58 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 64.9% | 68.0% | 48.4% | 52.5% | 54.9% | 61.2% | 48.3% |
| 28 | 2016 | 62/81 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 64.6% | 65.4% | 50.6% | 55.3% | 51.0% | 60.3% | 47.5% | 2019 | 35/35 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 65.3% | 63.2% | 50.1% | 51.6% | 50.7% | 58.5% | 44.4% |
| 29 | 2017 | 51/51 | 1.4 | 3.5 | 65.8% | 64.5% | 48.3% | 50.4% | 42.5% | 59.0% | 43.1% | 2020 | 7/7 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 70.4% | 68.7% | 54.5% | 63.1% | 43.8% | 64.8% | 49.2% |
| 30 | 2018 | 56/63 | 1.5 | 3.2 | 63.7% | 65.7% | 49.3% | 54.9% | 51.0% | 59.7% | 48.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 45/49 | 1.4 | 3.2 | 62.3% | 64.1% | 49.7% | 56.1% | 51.1% | 58.4% | 46.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 13/13 | 1.4 | 3.3 | 67.6% | 61.8% | 47.8% | 60.6% | 57.3% | 57.0% | 42.9% | 2023 | 7/7 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 61.5% | 67.5% | 47.4% | 57.7% | 36.6% | 59.6% | 44.8% |
| 33 | 2021 | 44/44 | 1.2 | 3.4 | 65.8% | 63.0% | 46.7% | 55.9% | 51.8% | 57.4% | 46.3% | 2024 | 27/29 | 1.8 | 2.6 | 64.3% | 65.3% | 47.6% | 55.5% | 55.0% | 59.1% | 46.8% |
| 34 | 2022 | 22/22 | 1.3 | 3.3 | 66.2% | 62.0% | 49.1% | 64.1% | 46.7% | 57.5% | 45.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 16/20 | 1.4 | 3.3 | 69.4% | 60.3% | 43.5% | 58.8% | 57.0% | 55.0% | 41.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 672/756 | 1.5 | 3.1 | 64.9% | 63.9% | 47.7% | 54.5% | 50.3% | 58.2% | 46.2% | — | 788/895 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 67.9% | 65.0% | 49.7% | 56.4% | 52.2% | 60.0% | 47.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Angelique Kerber | Caroline Wozniacki | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1482 | 101.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.25 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1527 | 119.1 | +0.53 | +0.91 | 1.137 | 52.5% | +17 | — | — | 47.1% | -0.12 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.46 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1556 | 117.2 | -2.81 | -1.82 | 0.860 | 46.7% | +15 | -35 | — | 46.0% | -0.59 | 4–5 (44%) | 7–1 (88%) | — | +0.40 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1914 | 154.8 | +4.79 | +4.70 | 1.241 | 54.7% | -5 | -303 | -228 | 69.9% | +1.69 | 9–5 (64%) | 6–8 (43%) | — | -0.96 |
| 18 | 2006 | 1516 | 107.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.26 | 2009 | 1899 | 153.9 | +3.97 | +4.82 | 1.208 | 54.1% | -27 | -24 | -64 | 69.4% | +1.47 | 15–8 (65%) | 11–7 (61%) | — | -0.77 |
| 19 | 2007 | 1549 | 124.6 | +0.02 | -1.44 | 0.935 | 48.4% | -29 | — | +104 | 34.4% | -0.87 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.88 | 2010 | 2105 | 166.0 | +4.94 | +4.76 | 1.219 | 54.3% | +27 | -204 | -284 | 72.4% | +1.70 | 18–4 (82%) | 8–2 (80%) | — | +1.46 |
| 20 | 2008 | 1504 | 112.7 | -2.69 | +0.78 | 0.944 | 48.5% | +37 | -41 | +104 | 37.8% | -0.69 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–4 (20%) | — | -0.05 | 2011 | 1988 | 162.1 | +5.76 | +7.01 | 1.328 | 56.0% | +52 | -9 | -153 | 74.7% | +1.90 | 11–7 (61%) | 10–5 (67%) | — | +1.97 |
| 21 | 2009 | 1513 | 113.2 | -1.90 | +0.77 | 0.918 | 48.2% | +14 | -33 | — | 38.1% | -0.71 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.11 | 2012 | 1976 | 156.2 | +3.80 | +4.12 | 1.171 | 53.6% | +42 | -42 | -144 | 66.9% | +1.29 | 15–9 (63%) | 11–8 (58%) | — | +0.75 |
| 22 | 2010 | 1668 | 127.6 | +0.01 | +1.81 | 1.048 | 51.1% | -38 | -116 | +2 | 55.8% | +0.35 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–0 (100%) | — | +1.05 | 2013 | 1906 | 152.3 | +3.39 | +3.53 | 1.156 | 53.3% | +82 | -137 | -61 | 61.0% | +1.06 | 9–9 (50%) | 6–9 (40%) | — | +3.21 |
| 23 | 2011 | 1674 | 134.3 | +0.19 | +2.26 | 1.075 | 51.7% | +34 | -185 | — | 51.7% | +0.20 | 3–12 (20%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | +0.30 | 2014 | 2014 | 163.0 | +4.24 | +5.25 | 1.216 | 54.2% | +24 | -280 | -133 | 64.9% | +1.45 | 16–6 (73%) | 5–10 (33%) | — | -0.30 |
| 24 | 2012 | 1978 | 159.7 | +4.77 | +3.63 | 1.156 | 53.1% | -43 | -216 | -93 | 65.7% | +1.17 | 20–3 (87%) | 8–8 (50%) | — | -5.25 | 2015 | 1818 | 153.2 | +3.21 | +4.72 | 1.211 | 54.0% | +6 | -9 | +74 | 62.6% | +1.23 | 9–6 (60%) | 8–7 (53%) | — | -0.90 |
| 25 | 2013 | 1944 | 154.5 | +3.64 | +3.42 | 1.160 | 53.2% | +8 | -94 | -90 | 64.3% | +1.08 | 11–11 (50%) | 9–9 (50%) | — | +2.00 | 2016 | 1912 | 146.8 | +3.41 | +3.91 | 1.191 | 53.8% | +27 | — | -117 | 65.2% | +1.25 | 8–7 (53%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | -0.32 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1894 | 152.3 | +1.64 | +4.02 | 1.107 | 52.2% | +8 | -104 | +54 | 62.8% | +0.86 | 13–9 (59%) | 12–6 (67%) | — | +1.84 | 2017 | 2004 | 161.0 | +3.93 | +4.95 | 1.202 | 54.0% | +52 | -146 | -103 | 68.5% | +1.56 | 17–8 (68%) | 5–6 (45%) | — | +0.13 |
| 27 | 2015 | 1925 | 151.7 | +2.11 | +5.08 | 1.156 | 52.9% | -42 | -27 | +57 | 66.1% | +1.10 | 15–11 (58%) | 7–7 (50%) | — | +0.09 | 2018 | 1947 | 156.8 | +4.39 | +5.24 | 1.245 | 54.7% | +6 | -64 | +24 | 67.7% | +1.47 | 12–6 (67%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | +0.11 |
| 28 | 2016 | 2033 | 161.3 | +4.59 | +4.69 | 1.196 | 53.6% | +9 | -126 | -3 | 71.2% | +1.42 | 17–6 (74%) | 10–2 (83%) | — | -2.44 | 2019 | 1845 | 144.8 | +1.89 | +0.99 | 1.069 | 51.3% | +47 | -6 | +118 | 60.8% | +0.70 | 3–7 (30%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | +0.87 |
| 29 | 2017 | 1771 | 141.8 | +2.16 | +0.76 | 1.052 | 50.7% | +40 | +66 | +270 | 55.2% | +0.35 | 8–8 (50%) | 7–4 (64%) | — | +1.30 | 2020 | 1853 | 131.5 | +2.36 | +2.51 | 1.397 | 56.9% | +35 | — | — | 70.6% | +1.71 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.18 |
| 30 | 2018 | 1934 | 162.5 | +3.42 | +5.45 | 1.194 | 53.8% | -31 | -15 | +180 | 69.2% | +1.29 | 12–9 (57%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | -1.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 1806 | 145.9 | +1.58 | +3.10 | 1.110 | 52.1% | -9 | +93 | +300 | 59.6% | +0.61 | 6–11 (35%) | 8–4 (67%) | — | +0.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 1769 | 128.3 | -0.58 | -0.32 | 0.999 | 50.1% | +43 | — | — | 53.6% | +0.36 | 1–1 | 2–4 (33%) | — | +1.28 | 2023 | 1863 | 134.9 | +2.02 | +2.05 | 1.110 | 51.8% | +58 | — | — | 56.3% | +0.56 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.17 |
| 33 | 2021 | 1937 | 147.2 | +1.85 | +3.37 | 1.088 | 51.7% | -71 | -89 | +351 | 58.2% | +0.72 | 11–3 (79%) | 3–4 (43%) | — | -0.34 | 2024 | 1845 | 140.8 | +1.93 | +2.73 | 1.145 | 53.0% | +44 | -42 | +224 | 58.1% | +0.77 | 4–6 (40%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.15 |
| 34 | 2022 | 1880 | 133.0 | +1.28 | +1.93 | 1.061 | 51.3% | -34 | +12 | +356 | 54.9% | +0.43 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 1830 | 133.9 | -0.86 | +0.60 | 0.931 | 48.8% | -1 | +62 | +281 | 46.7% | -0.20 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2055 | 154.9 | +2.19 | +3.14 | 1.105 | 52.1% | -7 | -70 | +130 | 60.6% | +0.76 | 134–105 (56%) | 93–66 (58%) | 104.2 | -0.44 | — | 2154 | 160.9 | +3.84 | +4.42 | 1.199 | 53.9% | +28 | -90 | -57 | 66.3% | +1.33 | 153–96 (61%) | 94–79 (54%) | 104.3 | +0.57 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Wozniacki | 8 | 8 | 16 | Mar 13, 2024 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 8 | 6 | 14 | Aug 21, 2021 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 6 | 8 | 14 | Aug 19, 2021 | H2H |
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 6 | 8 | 14 | Jan 28, 2020 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Makarova | 8 | 6 | 14 | Mar 10, 2018 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 11 | 6 | 17 | Aug 11, 2017 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 8 | 8 | 16 | Mar 13, 2024 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 7 | 8 | 15 | Aug 31, 2023 | H2H |
| Dominika Cibulkova | 10 | 4 | 14 | Sep 23, 2017 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 8 | 6 | 14 | Jun 6, 2017 | H2H |