H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Angelique Kerber vs Daniela Hantuchova H2H: 2-2
Angelique Kerber and Daniela Hantuchova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Angelique Kerber won the 2014 Roland Garros third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 43
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2014* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Angelique Kerber | 7-5 6-3 | Daniela Hantuchova | Match data |
| Oct 22, 2010* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Angelique Kerber | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Daniela Hantuchova | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2010* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-3 6-3 | Angelique Kerber | Match data |
| Apr 16, 2010* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-7(6) 7-5 6-3 | Angelique Kerber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelique Kerber | #205 | #1 | 9,080 | 2,045 | 461 | 270 | 63.1% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 14 |
| Daniela Hantuchova | #317 | #5 | 2,897 | 1,968 | 457 | 361 | 55.9% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Angelique Kerber | Daniela Hantuchova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #19 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2011 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #32 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2012 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #5 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,930 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2013 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,947 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #21 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,807 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2015 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #10 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2016 | 54–16 | 77.1% | #1 | 2,024 | 2 | 10 | 2011 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #24 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2017 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #21 | 1,767 | 2 | 10 | 2012 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2018 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #2 | 1,924 | 3 | 12 | 2013 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2019 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #20 | 1,800 | 3 | 12 | 2014 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #62 | 1,577 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,764 | 3 | 12 | 2015 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #83 | 1,574 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 2021 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #16 | 1,933 | 3 | 13 | 2016 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #228 | 1,514 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | 2022 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,878 | 3 | 14 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,524 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | 2024 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #205 | 1,788 | 3 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |