H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Angelique Kerber vs Madison Brengle H2H: 4-0

Angelique Kerber holds a 4–0 lead over Madison Brengle in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Angelique Kerber leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Angelique Kerber won the 2016 Australian Open third round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Angelique Kerber
GER Age 38 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Madison Brengle
USA Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 24, 2016* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Angelique Kerber #6 6-1 6-3 Madison Brengle #49 Match data
Jan 7, 2016* Brisbane WTA 500 R16 Hard Angelique Kerber #10 6-3 6-0 Madison Brengle #40 Match data
Sep 25, 2015* Tokyo WTA 500 R16 Hard Angelique Kerber #9 5-7 6-1 6-0 Madison Brengle #37 Match data
Apr 25, 2015* Stuttgart WTA 500 SF Clay Angelique Kerber #14 6-3 6-1 Madison Brengle #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Angelique Kerber #205 #1 9,080 2,045 461 270 63.1% 3 0 0 10 1 14
Madison Brengle #210 #35 1,324 1,740 94 151 38.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Angelique Kerber Madison Brengle
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,502 0 0
18 2006 1–1 50.0% #172 1,515 0 0 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,457 0 0
19 2007 6–10 37.5% #88 1,548 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,456 0 0
20 2008 7–14 33.3% #100 1,504 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,447 0 0
21 2009 3–6 33.3% #117 1,512 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,459 0 0
22 2010 23–19 54.8% #46 1,668 0 0 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,444 0 0
23 2011 17–20 45.9% #32 1,675 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2012 57–20 74.0% #5 1,983 0 2 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,503 0 0
25 2013 45–22 67.2% #9 1,947 0 3 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,627 0 0
26 2014 43–22 66.2% #9 1,895 0 3 2016 16–22 42.1% #73 1,602 0 0
27 2015 51–22 69.9% #10 1,917 0 7 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,656 0 0
28 2016 54–16 77.1% #1 2,024 2 10 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,606 0 0
29 2017 28–23 54.9% #21 1,767 2 10 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0
30 2018 43–16 72.9% #2 1,924 3 12 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,641 0 0
31 2019 28–19 59.6% #20 1,800 3 12 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0
32 2020 7–6 53.8% #25 1,764 3 12 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,637 0 0
33 2021 29–15 65.9% #16 1,933 3 13 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,586 0 0
34 2022 13–9 59.1% #104 1,878 3 14 — — — — — — —
36 2024 6–10 37.5% #205 1,788 3 14 — — — — — — —