H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Angelique Kerber vs Petra Kvitova H2H: 8-5
Angelique Kerber holds a 8–5 lead over Petra Kvitova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, Angelique Kerber leads 4–3 on hard courts and 3–2 on clay. Most recently, Angelique Kerber won the 2021 Cincinnati quarterfinal 6-4 3-3 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
8
–
5
13 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 36
Left-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2021* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Angelique Kerber | 6-4 3-3 (ret.) | Petra Kvitova | Match data |
| Jun 26, 2021* | Bad Homburg | WTA 500 | SF | Grass | Angelique Kerber | 3-6 6-4 7-6(3) | Petra Kvitova | Match data |
| May 3, 2021* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Petra Kvitova | 6-4 7-5 | Angelique Kerber | Match data |
| Apr 26, 2018* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Angelique Kerber | 6-3 6-2 | Petra Kvitova | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2016* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Petra Kvitova | 6-7(10) 7-5 6-4 | Angelique Kerber | Match data |
| Sep 6, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Angelique Kerber | 6-3 7-5 | Petra Kvitova | Match data |
| Apr 23, 2016* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Angelique Kerber | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | Petra Kvitova | Match data |
| Oct 25, 2015 | WTA Finals | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Angelique Kerber | 6-2 7-6(3) | Petra Kvitova | Match data |
| Oct 21, 2013 | WTA Championships | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Petra Kvitova | 6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 | Angelique Kerber | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2013* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | F | Hard | Petra Kvitova | 6-2 0-6 6-3 | Angelique Kerber | Match data |
| Aug 18, 2012* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Angelique Kerber | 6-1 2-6 6-4 | Petra Kvitova | Match data |
| May 19, 2012* | Rome | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Angelique Kerber | 7-6(2) 1-6 6-1 | Petra Kvitova | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2012* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Petra Kvitova | 6-4 6-4 | Angelique Kerber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelique Kerber | #205 | #1 | 9,080 | 2,045 | 461 | 270 | 63.1% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 14 |
| Petra Kvitova | #450 | #2 | 7,690 | 2,073 | 501 | 258 | 66.0% | 2 | 10 | 2 | 14 | 3 | 31 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Angelique Kerber | Petra Kvitova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #50 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #34 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 50–11 | 82.0% | #2 | 2,058 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 2010 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #8 | 1,961 | 1 | 9 |
| 23 | 2011 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #32 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 49–22 | 69.0% | #6 | 1,966 | 1 | 11 |
| 24 | 2012 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #5 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 2 | 14 |
| 25 | 2013 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,947 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #6 | 1,907 | 2 | 17 |
| 26 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #11 | 1,966 | 2 | 19 |
| 27 | 2015 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #10 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #29 | 1,894 | 2 | 20 |
| 28 | 2016 | 54–16 | 77.1% | #1 | 2,024 | 2 | 10 | 2018 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 2 | 25 |
| 29 | 2017 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #21 | 1,767 | 2 | 10 | 2019 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #7 | 1,897 | 2 | 27 |
| 30 | 2018 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #2 | 1,924 | 3 | 12 | 2020 | 20–7 | 74.1% | #8 | 1,947 | 2 | 27 |
| 31 | 2019 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #20 | 1,800 | 3 | 12 | 2021 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #17 | 1,881 | 2 | 28 |
| 32 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,764 | 3 | 12 | 2022 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #16 | 1,920 | 2 | 29 |
| 33 | 2021 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #16 | 1,933 | 3 | 13 | 2023 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #14 | 1,931 | 2 | 31 |
| 34 | 2022 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,878 | 3 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,773 | 2 | 31 |
| 36 | 2024 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #205 | 1,788 | 3 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |