H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anhelina Kalinina vs Nao Hibino H2H: 1-1
Anhelina Kalinina and Nao Hibino are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anhelina Kalinina leads 1–0 on clay, while Nao Hibino leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anhelina Kalinina won the 2025 Rouen third round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 29
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2025 | Rouen | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Anhelina Kalinina | 6-0 6-4 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
| Oct 1, 2015* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Nao Hibino | 6-4 6-4 | Anhelina Kalinina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anhelina Kalinina | #59 | #25 | 1,677 | 1,901 | 96 | 106 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nao Hibino | #235 | #56 | 1,050 | 1,726 | 79 | 118 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anhelina Kalinina | Nao Hibino | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #66 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #107 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #52 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2022 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,827 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2023 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #28 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #129 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2024 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #55 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #127 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2026 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #145 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #174 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |