Ann Li
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Osorio | 4 | 2 | 6 | Aug 24, 2026 | H2H |
| Maria Timofeeva | 4 | 0 | 4 | Aug 26, 2026 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 4 | 0 | 4 | Aug 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 23, 2026 | H2H |
| Coco Gauff | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 18, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Ann Li vs Nadia Podoroska H2H: 0-1
Nadia Podoroska holds a 1–0 lead over Ann Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nadia Podoroska leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nadia Podoroska won the 2021 Wimbledon first round 6-4 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Podoroska | 6-4 7-6(1) | Ann Li | Match data | Jun 30, 2021* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Li | #28 | #28 | 1,683 | 1,844 | 95 | 85 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nadia Podoroska | #449 | #36 | 1,787 | 1,767 | 55 | 81 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Li | Nadia Podoroska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #98 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 19–10 | 65.5% | #47 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #304 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #129 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #169 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #47 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #96 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #38 | 1,816 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #67 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–25 | 28.6% | #100 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #471 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #449 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Ann Li | Nadia Podoroska | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 17 | 7 | 24 | 70.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2018 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 25 | 2025 | 21 | 15 | 36 | 58.3% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2022 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2026 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 48.1% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2023 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 68 | 59 | 127 | 53.5% | 19 | 15 | 34 | 55.9% | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | — | 31 | 45 | 76 | 40.8% | 19 | 28 | 47 | 40.4% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 165/181 of Ann Li's and 131/135 of Nadia Podoroska's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Ann Li | Nadia Podoroska | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3/3 | 1.3 | 3.7 | 61.3% | 57.4% | 38.5% | 38.6% | 25.8% | 50.0% | 36.9% |
| 20 | 2020 | 7/7 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 65.4% | 60.3% | 45.8% | 47.0% | 36.5% | 55.3% | 40.2% | 2017 | 6/6 | 0.3 | 4.5 | 64.8% | 46.8% | 41.7% | 37.2% | 30.8% | 44.6% | 40.2% |
| 21 | 2021 | 29/29 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 60.3% | 63.9% | 50.2% | 57.1% | 48.1% | 58.7% | 47.0% | 2018 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 63.2% | 53.8% | 52.5% | 51.8% | 60.6% | 53.4% | 48.3% |
| 22 | 2022 | 25/27 | 1.8 | 2.7 | 60.9% | 61.1% | 44.6% | 53.2% | 42.5% | 54.5% | 40.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 5/5 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 54.4% | 63.4% | 45.2% | 51.9% | 43.3% | 54.6% | 37.0% | 2020 | 11/11 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 68.6% | 52.6% | 48.3% | 49.7% | 43.7% | 51.2% | 46.7% |
| 24 | 2024 | 12/12 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 66.0% | 65.9% | 44.5% | 51.4% | 45.0% | 58.5% | 47.5% | 2021 | 31/34 | 2.5 | 3.7 | 61.1% | 62.3% | 46.9% | 52.9% | 43.9% | 56.0% | 45.6% |
| 25 | 2025 | 42/54 | 4.5 | 2.4 | 58.4% | 66.4% | 48.0% | 50.5% | 45.8% | 58.6% | 44.4% | 2022 | 8/8 | 1.5 | 5.3 | 63.1% | 66.6% | 45.4% | 56.2% | 44.3% | 59.0% | 42.8% |
| 26 | 2026 | 45/47 | 4.8 | 2.8 | 58.5% | 67.8% | 45.0% | 57.2% | 47.2% | 58.4% | 42.0% | 2023 | 31/31 | 1.8 | 4.1 | 61.7% | 60.8% | 42.9% | 52.9% | 56.4% | 54.0% | 40.8% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 34/35 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 65.4% | 58.5% | 40.2% | 50.1% | 40.3% | 52.2% | 40.3% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 5/5 | 2.2 | 4.6 | 66.0% | 59.4% | 50.2% | 40.9% | 17.3% | 54.9% | 36.7% |
| Career | — | 165/181 | 3.3 | 2.6 | 59.9% | 65.2% | 46.6% | 53.8% | 45.6% | 57.7% | 43.5% | — | 131/136 | 1.7 | 3.7 | 63.5% | 59.4% | 44.0% | 50.6% | 44.1% | 53.6% | 42.2% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Ann Li | Nadia Podoroska | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2018 | 1511 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 1527 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1575 | 106.0 | -1.26 | -1.72 | 0.738 | 43.2% | — | — | — | 14.3% | -3.00 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.22 |
| 20 | 2020 | 1613 | 127.7 | -1.21 | -0.60 | 0.898 | 47.9% | +17 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 1–0 | 2–0 | — | +0.13 | 2017 | 1609 | 100.8 | -4.92 | -1.96 | 0.726 | 42.0% | — | -7 | — | 33.3% | -1.92 | 2–0 | — | — | -0.05 |
| 21 | 2021 | 1755 | 141.4 | +1.81 | +2.79 | 1.138 | 52.9% | +27 | — | -163 | 62.5% | +0.88 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–2 (67%) | 102.3 | +0.04 | 2018 | 1581 | 102.9 | -0.91 | -1.28 | 1.037 | 51.0% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.04 |
| 22 | 2022 | 1667 | 126.3 | -1.81 | -0.68 | 0.898 | 48.0% | +42 | — | -81 | 42.6% | -0.41 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–6 (25%) | 97.9 | -1.14 | 2019 | 1510 | 85.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 1669 | 123.4 | -0.74 | -1.07 | 0.814 | 46.1% | +18 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.50 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.31 | 2020 | 1737 | 123.1 | -2.40 | +1.52 | 0.955 | 49.0% | -106 | +39 | — | 56.0% | +0.04 | 3–0 (100%) | 0–1 | — | -0.19 |
| 24 | 2024 | 1706 | 123.8 | +0.97 | +1.36 | 1.145 | 52.8% | -63 | +90 | — | 53.6% | +0.72 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–1 | — | +0.29 | 2021 | 1713 | 130.1 | -0.63 | +2.06 | 1.037 | 50.8% | -79 | +84 | -38 | 48.0% | -0.13 | 5–4 (56%) | 7–2 (78%) | 105.0 | +0.71 |
| 25 | 2025 | 1817 | 139.2 | +1.60 | +0.86 | 1.071 | 51.3% | -21 | -53 | -232 | 55.6% | +0.32 | 9–9 (50%) | 9–7 (56%) | 102.2 | -1.29 | 2022 | 1660 | 105.0 | +0.71 | -0.89 | 1.044 | 50.7% | -31 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–0 | — | +0.84 |
| 26 | 2026 | 1792 | 142.7 | +1.18 | -0.52 | 1.008 | 50.2% | -16 | +23 | -173 | 49.1% | +0.06 | 12–10 (55%) | 7–8 (47%) | 102.5 | +1.69 | 2023 | 1670 | 120.5 | -1.86 | -1.71 | 0.886 | 47.7% | -27 | +84 | -50 | 43.2% | -0.43 | 6–6 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 100.0 | -0.19 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1644 | 121.6 | -3.46 | -2.62 | 0.842 | 46.2% | +35 | -18 | — | 33.3% | -1.16 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–6 (25%) | 93.1 | -0.31 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1641 | 106.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.25 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1614 | 110.8 | +1.33 | -1.66 | 0.814 | 45.1% | — | — | — | 30.8% | -1.54 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.17 |
| Career | — | 1845 | 141.5 | +0.77 | +0.51 | 1.027 | 50.6% | -1 | -2 | -150 | 51.4% | +0.17 | 35–29 (55%) | 26–24 (52%) | 106.2 | -0.33 | — | 1768 | 121.8 | -1.86 | -0.74 | 0.910 | 47.9% | -29 | +39 | -44 | 41.7% | -0.67 | 21–20 (51%) | 14–13 (52%) | 101.1 | +0.15 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Nadia Podoroska
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatjana Maria | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 22, 2024 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 26, 2024 | H2H |
| Katerina Siniakova | 3 | 0 | 3 | Sep 20, 2024 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 28, 2024 | H2H |
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 23, 2024 | H2H |