H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anna Chakvetadze vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 2-3

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 3–2 lead over Anna Chakvetadze in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Chakvetadze won the 2008 New Haven semifinal 6-3 3-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna Chakvetadze
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 23, 2008* New Haven WTA 500 SF Hard Anna Chakvetadze #11 6-3 3-6 6-1 Amélie Mauresmo #33 Match data
Feb 9, 2008* Paris WTA 500 QF Carpet Anna Chakvetadze #7 3-6 6-3 6-3 Amélie Mauresmo #18 Match data
Feb 17, 2007* Antwerp WTA 500 SF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-3 3-6 6-2 Anna Chakvetadze #12 Match data
Feb 10, 2007* Paris WTA 500 QF Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #3 7-6(5) 7-5 Anna Chakvetadze #13 Match data
May 12, 2006* Berlin WTA 1000 R16 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #1 6-4 6-2 Anna Chakvetadze #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anna Chakvetadze #577 #5 2,940 2,067 183 135 57.5% 0 1 0 5 2 8
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna Chakvetadze Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 2004 2–3 40.0% #83 1,526 0 0 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0
18 2005 24–21 53.3% #32 1,716 0 0 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0
19 2006 37–20 64.9% #13 1,936 0 2 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1
20 2007 56–19 74.7% #6 1,984 0 6 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2
21 2008 26–23 53.1% #18 1,721 0 7 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6
22 2009 14–18 43.8% #67 1,711 0 7 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8
23 2010 18–15 54.5% #56 1,715 0 8 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10
24 2011 3–8 27.3% #234 1,641 0 8 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15
25 2012 3–8 27.3% #224 1,557 0 8 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19
26 — — — — — — — 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23
27 — — — — — — — 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24
28 — — — — — — — 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24
29 — — — — — — — 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25