H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Anna Chakvetadze vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 2-3

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 3–2 lead over Anna Chakvetadze in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Chakvetadze won the 2008 New Haven semifinal 6-3 3-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna Chakvetadze
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anna Chakvetadze #11 6-3 3-6 6-1 Amélie Mauresmo #33 Match data Aug 23, 2008* SF New Haven Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Anna Chakvetadze #7 3-6 6-3 6-3 Amélie Mauresmo #18 Match data Feb 9, 2008* QF Paris Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-3 3-6 6-2 Anna Chakvetadze #12 Match data Feb 17, 2007* SF Antwerp Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #3 7-6(5) 7-5 Anna Chakvetadze #13 Match data Feb 10, 2007* QF Paris Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Amélie Mauresmo #1 6-4 6-2 Anna Chakvetadze #27 Match data May 12, 2006* R16 Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anna Chakvetadze #577 #5 2,940 2,066 183 135 57.5% 0 1 0 2 5 8
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna Chakvetadze Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 2004 2–3 40.0% #83 1,527 0 0 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0
18 2005 24–21 53.3% #32 1,715 0 0 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0
19 2006 37–20 64.9% #13 1,914 0 2 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1
20 2007 56–19 74.7% #6 1,988 0 6 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2
21 2008 26–23 53.1% #18 1,723 0 7 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6
22 2009 14–18 43.8% #67 1,714 0 7 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8
23 2010 18–15 54.5% #56 1,714 0 8 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10
24 2011 3–8 27.3% #234 1,640 0 8 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15
25 2012 3–8 27.3% #224 1,555 0 8 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19
26 — — — — — — — 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23
27 — — — — — — — 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24
28 — — — — — — — 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24
29 — — — — — — — 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anna Chakvetadze Amélie Mauresmo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
17 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
18 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 2006 23 11 34 67.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7%
20 2007 39 13 52 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 2008 13 16 29 44.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9%
22 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 2010 14 10 24 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 2011 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
25 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0%
Career — 121 86 207 58.5% 29 30 59 49.2% 22 15 37 59.5% 11 4 15 73.3% — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 250/318 of Anna Chakvetadze's and 222/395 of Amélie Mauresmo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anna Chakvetadze Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2004 3/5 3.3 5.3 61.2% 60.8% 43.7% 34.3% 55.6% 54.0% 45.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 13/45 1.8 4.8 58.2% 62.8% 38.8% 47.2% 39.5% 53.3% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 39/57 2.9 3.7 59.4% 64.2% 46.6% 54.3% 46.9% 57.0% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 67/75 3.0 3.7 60.3% 66.4% 49.0% 57.7% 51.2% 59.4% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 44/49 3.6 6.5 55.3% 64.7% 41.6% 55.3% 53.0% 54.3% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 31/32 1.8 5.7 63.5% 60.6% 41.0% 48.9% 53.9% 53.4% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 33/33 1.7 5.0 61.2% 60.5% 45.7% 53.6% 50.7% 55.1% 45.8% 2003 10/62 2.3 2.9 63.3% 73.3% 50.3% 41.3% 41.8% 65.2% 48.3%
24 2011 9/11 2.1 3.8 58.9% 60.7% 41.5% 50.7% 47.5% 53.1% 46.0% 2004 18/73 4.5 4.4 58.2% 74.6% 52.0% 54.6% 50.2% 65.2% 51.1%
25 2012 11/11 2.5 3.4 60.5% 62.6% 40.0% 44.4% 57.5% 53.5% 41.2% 2005 24/69 3.2 4.3 58.0% 72.7% 50.1% 57.2% 55.5% 63.0% 47.6%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 55/64 2.6 2.9 64.8% 68.0% 49.1% 60.4% 53.9% 61.2% 47.1%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 36/41 4.4 4.8 61.2% 69.9% 45.6% 56.1% 53.4% 60.6% 45.7%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 45/49 3.3 6.3 61.4% 67.4% 43.0% 56.0% 51.2% 57.9% 47.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 34/37 4.0 5.5 60.2% 67.0% 45.7% 55.9% 48.6% 58.9% 45.1%
Career — 250/318 2.7 4.7 59.7% 63.6% 44.6% 53.4% 50.7% 55.9% 45.7% — 222/648 3.5 4.6 61.5% 69.3% 47.2% 56.4% 51.8% 60.8% 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anna Chakvetadze Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03
17 2004 1528 120.5 +0.93 +0.41 0.997 50.0% +25 — — 46.2% -0.15 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.22 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.06
18 2005 1716 140.9 -0.63 +0.16 0.934 48.6% -37 -113 -71 51.9% +0.09 10–6 (63%) 0–7 (0%) — -1.79 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.59
19 2006 1915 148.0 +1.63 +1.41 1.040 50.8% -5 -246 -221 63.0% +0.79 10–5 (67%) 5–4 (56%) — -2.00 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.67
20 2007 1988 159.4 +3.68 +3.72 1.156 53.1% +9 -222 -132 69.6% +1.32 15–4 (79%) 11–10 (52%) — -0.45 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) — -1.71
21 2008 1724 136.7 -0.16 +2.53 1.031 50.8% +43 -1 +130 53.3% +0.29 12–14 (46%) 4–6 (40%) — +2.95 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) — -2.74
22 2009 1714 134.0 -0.92 +1.31 0.958 49.2% +9 +9 +92 45.7% -0.32 8–9 (47%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.09 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) — -0.13
23 2010 1714 128.7 -0.49 +1.32 1.020 50.4% +15 -55 +111 56.8% +0.36 6–6 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.41 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) — -2.28
24 2011 1641 112.2 +0.12 +1.73 0.980 49.6% +60 — — 37.5% -0.88 — 1–1 — -0.46 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.48
25 2012 1556 102.0 -1.55 -1.87 0.886 47.7% +83 +20 — 36.4% -0.91 0–2 0–1 — +0.48 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) — -0.83
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) — -3.85
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) — -1.04
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) — +0.52
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.60
Career — 2067 147.7 +0.95 +1.99 1.038 50.8% +11 -114 -36 56.9% +0.44 62–48 (56%) 29–38 (43%) 99.6 -0.63 — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.