H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anna Chakvetadze vs Anastasia Myskina H2H: 1-1
Anna Chakvetadze and Anastasia Myskina are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasia Myskina won the 2006 Miami fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2006* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Anastasia Myskina | 6-3 6-2 | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2004* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Anna Chakvetadze | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Anastasia Myskina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Chakvetadze | #577 | #5 | 2,940 | 2,067 | 183 | 135 | 57.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Anastasia Myskina | #1,101 | #2 | 4,247 | 2,084 | 235 | 138 | 63.0% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Anastasia Myskina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2005 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #58 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2006 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #13 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #59 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2007 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #6 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #7 | 1,958 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2009 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #67 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #3 | 2,040 | 1 | 9 |
| 23 | 2010 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,715 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #14 | 1,934 | 1 | 10 |
| 24 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #234 | 1,641 | 0 | 8 | 2006 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #16 | 1,818 | 1 | 10 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #224 | 1,557 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,769 | 1 | 10 |