H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anna Chakvetadze vs Galina Voskoboeva H2H: 0-2
Galina Voskoboeva holds a 2–0 lead over Anna Chakvetadze in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Galina Voskoboeva leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Galina Voskoboeva won the 2012 Tashkent fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2012* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Galina Voskoboeva | 6-1 6-3 | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data |
| Aug 24, 2006* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Galina Voskoboeva | 6-3 6-5 (ret.) | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Chakvetadze | #577 | #5 | 2,940 | 2,067 | 183 | 135 | 57.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Galina Voskoboeva | #1,417 | #42 | 1,284 | 1,701 | 70 | 120 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Galina Voskoboeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #13 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #140 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #6 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #113 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #114 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #67 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #133 | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,715 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #234 | 1,641 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #106 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #224 | 1,557 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #532 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #58 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #82 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #67 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #259 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #421 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |