H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anna Chakvetadze vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 1-0

Anna Chakvetadze holds a 1–0 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna Chakvetadze leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna Chakvetadze won the 2009 Madrid Open first round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna Chakvetadze
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anna Chakvetadze #22 6-4 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #118 Match data May 11, 2009 R64 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anna Chakvetadze #577 #5 2,940 2,066 183 135 57.5% 0 1 0 2 5 8
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,818 200 236 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna Chakvetadze Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 2004 2–3 40.0% #83 1,527 0 0 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 2005 24–21 53.3% #32 1,715 0 0 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,493 0 0
19 2006 37–20 64.9% #13 1,914 0 2 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 2007 56–19 74.7% #6 1,988 0 6 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,476 0 0
21 2008 26–23 53.1% #18 1,723 0 7 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 2009 14–18 43.8% #67 1,714 0 7 1996 9–16 36.0% #87 1,578 0 0
23 2010 18–15 54.5% #56 1,714 0 8 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,732 0 1
24 2011 3–8 27.3% #234 1,640 0 8 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,776 0 2
25 2012 3–8 27.3% #224 1,555 0 8 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,660 0 2
26 — — — — — — — 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,645 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,634 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,645 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,557 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,629 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,621 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,592 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anna Chakvetadze Virginia Ruano Pascual
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2006 23 11 34 67.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2007 39 13 52 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2008 13 16 29 44.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2010 14 10 24 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 16 7 23 69.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2011 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1998 6 6 12 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 3 4 7 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 5 11 16 31.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 7 10 17 41.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 6 7 13 46.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 121 86 207 58.5% 29 30 59 49.2% 22 15 37 59.5% 11 4 15 73.3% — 78 95 173 45.1% 103 113 216 47.7% 15 18 33 45.5% 4 10 14 28.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anna Chakvetadze Virginia Ruano Pascual
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1482 96.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18
17 2004 1528 120.5 +0.93 +0.41 0.997 50.0% +25 — — 46.2% -0.15 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.22 1991 1500 99.8 — — — — — +51 — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.24
18 2005 1716 140.9 -0.63 +0.16 0.934 48.6% -37 -113 -71 51.9% +0.09 10–6 (63%) 0–7 (0%) 103.3 -1.79 1992 1494 108.5 — — — — — +57 — 20.0% -2.30 — — — -0.36
19 2006 1915 148.0 +1.63 +1.41 1.040 50.8% -5 -246 -221 63.0% +0.79 10–5 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 107.1 -2.00 1993 1515 112.1 — — — — +6 +45 — 38.9% -0.81 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 +0.39
20 2007 1988 159.4 +3.68 +3.72 1.156 53.1% +9 -222 -132 69.6% +1.32 15–4 (79%) 11–10 (52%) 107.4 -0.45 1994 1477 97.0 — — — — — — — 11.1% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.02
21 2008 1724 136.7 -0.16 +2.53 1.031 50.8% +43 -1 +130 53.3% +0.29 12–14 (46%) 4–6 (40%) 92.8 +2.95 1995 1563 122.2 — — — — -80 +84 — 44.9% -0.47 1–4 (20%) 4–0 (100%) 101.8 +0.72
22 2009 1714 134.0 -0.92 +1.31 0.958 49.2% +9 +9 +92 45.7% -0.32 8–9 (47%) 6–5 (55%) 98.5 -0.09 1996 1579 126.8 — — — — -49 +24 — 41.5% -0.58 1–6 (14%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.54
23 2010 1714 128.7 -0.49 +1.32 1.020 50.4% +15 -55 +111 56.8% +0.36 6–6 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 97.6 -0.41 1997 1733 134.8 — — — — -201 +46 — 59.7% +0.73 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 103.6 +0.26
24 2011 1641 112.2 +0.12 +1.73 0.980 49.6% +60 — — 37.5% -0.88 — 1–1 — -0.46 1998 1776 128.0 — — — — -190 +21 -133 52.5% +0.08 8–2 (80%) 3–3 (50%) 105.0 +0.47
25 2012 1556 102.0 -1.55 -1.87 0.886 47.7% +83 +20 — 36.4% -0.91 0–2 0–1 — +0.48 1999 1660 125.0 — — — — +3 -16 — 46.0% -0.25 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1645 110.8 — — — — -9 +3 — 50.0% -0.22 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — +0.51
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1607 125.9 — — — — +10 -10 — 45.8% -0.06 3–7 (30%) 3–4 (43%) 92.5 -0.34
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1634 125.4 — — — — -64 +48 — 51.6% +0.16 4–9 (31%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +0.57
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1695 119.9 -0.97 -0.92 0.780 45.2% +1 -67 — 51.9% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 100.9 +0.46
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1646 113.0 +0.06 +0.93 1.096 52.2% -62 +26 -34 46.0% -0.48 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 95.3 -0.60
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1558 111.3 -2.34 +0.61 0.895 47.0% -10 +41 +17 43.7% -0.70 4–11 (27%) 5–4 (56%) 95.2 -0.27
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1660 123.5 -1.95 +0.13 0.913 47.7% -22 -29 -79 53.3% -0.22 2–2 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 +0.27
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1630 114.4 -2.70 -1.70 0.870 47.0% +1 -49 0 47.3% -0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.3 +0.25
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1622 110.7 -3.08 -0.59 0.894 47.2% -6 -63 +17 41.7% -0.65 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 99.8 -0.37
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1621 116.1 -1.29 -1.20 0.849 46.4% -17 -30 — 35.3% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.67
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1592 94.6 -3.08 -1.43 0.568 37.4% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00
Career — 2067 147.7 +0.95 +1.99 1.038 50.8% +11 -114 -36 56.9% +0.44 62–48 (56%) 29–38 (43%) 99.6 -0.63 — 1819 126.4 -2.15 -0.62 0.891 47.4% -34 +18 -37 47.2% -0.29 56–75 (43%) 46–39 (54%) 97.4 +0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.