H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anna Chakvetadze vs Zi Yan H2H: 2-1
Anna Chakvetadze holds a 2–1 lead over Zi Yan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anna Chakvetadze leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anna Chakvetadze won the 2007 Rome third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
HKG
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2007* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Anna Chakvetadze | 6-1 6-3 | Zi Yan | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Anna Chakvetadze | 6-3 6-2 | Zi Yan | Match data |
| Jan 12, 2006* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Zi Yan | 6-3 6-3 | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Chakvetadze | #577 | #5 | 2,940 | 2,067 | 183 | 135 | 57.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Zi Yan | #789 | #40 | 678 | 1,634 | 34 | 57 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna Chakvetadze | Zi Yan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #13 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #6 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #104 | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #166 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #67 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,715 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #234 | 1,641 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,498 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #224 | 1,557 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #422 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |