H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anna Chakvetadze vs Zuzana Kucova H2H: 1-1
Anna Chakvetadze and Zuzana Kucova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Zuzana Kucova leads 1–0 on clay, while Anna Chakvetadze leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zuzana Kucova won the 2011 Stuttgart third round 1-6 7-5 4-4 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 44
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2011* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Zuzana Kucova | 1-6 7-5 4-4 (ret.) | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data |
| Sep 23, 2010* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Anna Chakvetadze | 6-3 7-5 | Zuzana Kucova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Chakvetadze | #577 | #5 | 2,940 | 2,067 | 183 | 135 | 57.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Zuzana Kucova | #295 | #101 | 650 | 1,518 | 6 | 19 | 24.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Zuzana Kucova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #13 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #6 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #67 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,715 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #234 | 1,641 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #224 | 1,557 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #238 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #190 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #295 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |