H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anna Kalinskaya vs Camila Osorio H2H: 2-2
Anna Kalinskaya and Camila Osorio are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Anna Kalinskaya leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna Kalinskaya won the 2026 Roland Garros third round 6-3 0-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
COL
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2026 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Anna Kalinskaya | 6-3 0-6 6-2 | Camila Osorio | Match data |
| Sep 27, 2025 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Camila Osorio | 6-1 4-6 6-4 | Anna Kalinskaya | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2022* | Guadalajara | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Anna Kalinskaya | 6-4 6-1 | Camila Osorio | Match data |
| Jun 30, 2021* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Camila Osorio | 1-6 6-0 6-4 | Anna Kalinskaya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Kalinskaya | #20 | #11 | 2,975 | 1,957 | 134 | 122 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Camila Osorio | #53 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,825 | 100 | 89 | 52.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Kalinskaya | Camila Osorio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2017 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #55 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2019 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2020 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #114 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2021 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #111 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2022 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #58 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #77 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2023 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2024 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2025 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,885 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2026 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #20 | 1,903 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |