H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:17 UTC
Anna Kalinskaya vs Magda Linette H2H: 1-1
Anna Kalinskaya and Magda Linette are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magda Linette leads 1–0 on grass, while Anna Kalinskaya leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Kalinskaya won the 2025 Washington DC fourth round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2025 | Washington DC | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Anna Kalinskaya | 6-4 6-0 | Magda Linette | Match data |
| Jul 3, 2019* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Magda Linette | 6-0 7-6(9) | Anna Kalinskaya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Kalinskaya | #20 | #11 | 2,975 | 1,957 | 134 | 122 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Magda Linette | #51 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 219 | 227 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Kalinskaya | Magda Linette | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2017 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2019 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2020 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #114 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #111 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #58 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2025 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,885 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2026 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #20 | 1,903 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,827 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #51 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 |