H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Anna Kalinskaya vs Sara Sorribes Tormo H2H: 1-0
Anna Kalinskaya holds a 1–0 lead over Sara Sorribes Tormo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna Kalinskaya leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Kalinskaya won the 2021 Indian Wells second round 6-3 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 29
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2021* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anna Kalinskaya | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
| Apr 23, 2018 | Istanbul | WTA 250 | Q2 | Clay | Anna Kalinskaya | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Kalinskaya | #20 | #11 | 2,975 | 1,957 | 134 | 122 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | #212 | #32 | 1,760 | 1,857 | 144 | 145 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Kalinskaya | Sara Sorribes Tormo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2017 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2018 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #114 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #86 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #111 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #58 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2024 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #61 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2025 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,885 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #48 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2026 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #20 | 1,903 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #106 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |