H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova vs Lesia Tsurenko H2H: 0-2
Lesia Tsurenko holds a 2–0 lead over Anna Karolina Schmiedlova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lesia Tsurenko leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lesia Tsurenko won the 2022 Istanbul third round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 31
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2022* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Lesia Tsurenko | 6-0 6-2 | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | Match data |
| Oct 23, 2015* | Moscow | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Lesia Tsurenko | 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | #379 | #26 | 1,875 | 1,792 | 115 | 162 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Lesia Tsurenko | #370 | #23 | 2,030 | 1,889 | 180 | 200 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | Lesia Tsurenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #83 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #73 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 3–22 | 12.0% | #227 | 1,486 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #155 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #116 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #134 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #68 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,678 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2022 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2023 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #72 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #42 | 1,699 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2024 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |