H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova vs Veronica Cepede Royg H2H: 1-0
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova holds a 1–0 lead over Veronica Cepede Royg in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna Karolina Schmiedlova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna Karolina Schmiedlova won the 2015 Rio de Janeiro quarterfinal 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 31
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
PAR
Age 34
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2015* | Rio de Janeiro | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | 6-3 6-1 | Veronica Cepede Royg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | #379 | #26 | 1,875 | 1,792 | 115 | 162 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Veronica Cepede Royg | #917 | #73 | 820 | 1,692 | 26 | 41 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | Veronica Cepede Royg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #83 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #73 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 3–22 | 12.0% | #227 | 1,486 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #134 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,678 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #75 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #138 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #72 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |