H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Alexa Glatch H2H: 1-0
Anna-Lena Friedsam holds a 1–0 lead over Alexa Glatch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna-Lena Friedsam leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna-Lena Friedsam won the 2015 Roland Garros first round 6-2 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Anna-Lena Friedsam | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Alexa Glatch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | #227 | #45 | 1,160 | 1,740 | 61 | 83 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alexa Glatch | #977 | #102 | 615 | 1,531 | 16 | 46 | 25.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Alexa Glatch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #525 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #140 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #85 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #297 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #95 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #155 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #121 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #426 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #483 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #145 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #138 | 1,414 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #111 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2021 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #140 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #583 | 1,377 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #120 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #135 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |