H2H data updated: 2026-10-19 00:00 UTC

Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Carla Suárez Navarro H2H: 0-1

Carla Suárez Navarro holds a 1–0 lead over Anna-Lena Friedsam in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Carla Suárez Navarro leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carla Suárez Navarro won the 2016 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix second round 6-2 6-2.

Germany Age 32 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
ESP Age 38 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Carla Suárez Navarro #11 6-2 6-2 Anna-Lena Friedsam #52 Match data Apr 22, 2016* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anna-Lena Friedsam #242 #45 1,160 1,743 62 84 42.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carla Suárez Navarro #342 #6 4,015 2,031 343 253 57.6% 0 1 0 0 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna-Lena Friedsam Carla Suárez Navarro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2008 13–12 52.0% #49 1,557 0 0
20 2014 7–10 41.2% #85 1,539 0 0 2009 29–25 53.7% #33 1,648 0 0
21 2015 11–14 44.0% #95 1,582 0 0 2010 21–14 60.0% #57 1,697 0 0
22 2016 15–14 51.7% #67 1,645 0 0 2011 15–12 55.6% #56 1,683 0 0
23 2017 0–1 0.0% #507 1,601 0 0 2012 24–25 49.0% #34 1,685 0 0
24 2018 1–2 33.3% #483 1,596 0 0 2013 41–26 61.2% #17 1,812 0 0
25 2019 7–9 43.8% #145 1,658 0 0 2014 50–25 66.7% #17 1,829 0 1
26 2020 5–4 55.6% #111 1,646 0 0 2015 41–25 62.1% #13 1,792 0 1
27 2021 5–11 31.2% #140 1,566 0 0 2016 37–21 63.8% #12 1,804 0 2
28 2022 4–3 57.1% #120 1,690 0 0 2017 26–23 53.1% #40 1,747 0 2
29 2023 7–14 33.3% #135 1,605 0 0 2018 27–20 57.4% #23 1,812 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2019 16–18 47.1% #54 1,740 0 2
31 2025 0–1 0.0% #154 1,652 0 0 2020 2–3 40.0% #84 1,716 0 2
32 2026 0–1 0.0% #242 1,571 0 0 2021 1–4 20.0% #342 1,706 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anna-Lena Friedsam Carla Suárez Navarro
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 6 8 25.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2014 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 11 12 23 47.8% 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 2015 7 9 16 43.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2010 11 8 19 57.9% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — —
22 2016 6 5 11 54.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2011 8 8 16 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2018 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 17 16 33 51.5% 16 7 23 69.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2014 30 17 47 63.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2020 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 27 18 45 60.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2021 3 5 8 37.5% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 23 14 37 62.2% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
28 2022 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 11 13 24 45.8% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2023 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2018 21 13 34 61.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 36 44 80 45.0% 18 28 46 39.1% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — 182 156 338 53.8% 131 69 200 65.5% 27 25 52 51.9% 3 3 6 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 129/145 of Anna-Lena Friedsam's and 519/597 of Carla Suárez Navarro's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anna-Lena Friedsam Carla Suárez Navarro
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 10/25 1.1 2.4 67.8% 60.0% 45.9% 46.1% 56.5% 55.3% 44.2%
20 2014 17/17 4.1 4.2 59.9% 64.7% 46.0% 49.9% 55.8% 56.9% 42.6% 2009 44/54 0.6 2.3 68.3% 58.3% 43.5% 48.8% 57.2% 53.5% 45.2%
21 2015 13/25 3.2 4.8 62.7% 64.0% 48.7% 45.1% 40.6% 58.1% 40.1% 2010 32/35 0.5 2.6 69.2% 60.2% 45.3% 57.5% 52.8% 55.6% 48.5%
22 2016 29/29 4.1 2.7 64.0% 66.8% 48.7% 55.2% 47.6% 60.2% 38.8% 2011 23/27 0.6 2.7 66.8% 58.5% 43.8% 46.3% 51.3% 53.5% 46.2%
23 2017 1/1 1.0 1.0 66.2% 51.0% 50.0% 61.5% 66.7% 50.6% 39.1% 2012 44/49 0.7 2.8 61.3% 57.8% 45.9% 47.7% 47.8% 53.5% 46.8%
24 2018 3/3 0.7 3.3 67.6% 52.3% 49.5% 65.9% 60.0% 52.0% 37.7% 2013 61/67 0.7 1.8 68.3% 59.6% 44.8% 49.5% 45.2% 54.8% 46.3%
25 2019 16/16 1.4 3.6 67.0% 62.6% 46.2% 56.0% 50.1% 56.9% 39.8% 2014 66/75 0.8 1.8 71.5% 61.3% 48.8% 59.3% 55.0% 57.6% 47.4%
26 2020 9/9 2.3 2.4 69.6% 67.9% 51.0% 45.4% 37.7% 62.7% 43.3% 2015 53/66 1.1 2.2 68.4% 59.9% 49.2% 52.3% 44.1% 56.5% 43.7%
27 2021 14/16 3.4 3.6 64.3% 63.5% 43.8% 55.2% 37.7% 56.5% 39.4% 2016 53/59 1.5 2.2 67.9% 65.0% 48.9% 55.9% 46.3% 59.6% 46.1%
28 2022 5/7 4.4 4.4 66.0% 62.0% 45.6% 57.1% 64.1% 56.3% 41.2% 2017 49/49 1.0 1.3 69.0% 61.2% 46.6% 51.4% 50.3% 56.7% 47.3%
29 2023 21/21 3.3 3.0 66.8% 62.2% 45.3% 54.4% 54.5% 56.6% 42.0% 2018 42/47 1.4 1.6 63.9% 63.3% 48.7% 48.5% 44.2% 57.8% 42.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 34/34 1.3 1.7 64.4% 61.0% 44.3% 53.0% 50.2% 54.9% 44.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 5/5 0.4 0.8 67.5% 62.6% 39.7% 54.8% 49.0% 54.7% 42.0%
32 2026 1/1 3.0 3.0 70.0% 50.0% 46.7% 41.7% 55.6% 49.0% 39.3% 2021 3/5 0.7 2.7 62.4% 55.1% 59.1% 31.7% 39.8% 56.1% 29.8%
Career — 129/146 3.3 3.4 64.8% 63.9% 47.0% 53.0% 48.8% 57.8% 40.5% — 519/597 0.9 2.0 67.5% 60.7% 46.7% 52.0% 49.4% 56.0% 45.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anna-Lena Friedsam Carla Suárez Navarro
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1557 116.3 +0.04 -0.08 0.990 49.7% -81 +116 — 54.7% +0.13 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 99.2 +0.90
20 2014 1540 113.8 +0.51 -1.51 0.986 49.8% +14 -1 — 43.9% -0.29 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 100.5 -0.25 2009 1648 129.9 -1.19 +1.22 0.973 49.5% -66 +60 +12 53.2% +0.02 10–8 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.7 +0.93
21 2015 1583 117.4 -0.11 -1.37 0.957 49.5% +1 -45 — 45.6% -0.30 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 100.4 +0.50 2010 1697 133.0 -0.35 +4.10 1.091 51.9% -34 +33 — 56.1% +0.49 10–4 (71%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -0.62
22 2016 1646 122.7 +3.29 -3.20 0.976 49.4% -4 -78 -8 49.2% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 101.2 -0.34 2011 1683 119.0 -1.15 +1.17 0.992 49.9% -33 +61 — 57.1% +0.23 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 101.9 +1.58
23 2017 1602 95.5 -1.10 -1.20 0.792 45.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.11 2012 1686 129.6 -1.52 +2.21 1.006 50.0% -30 +66 -61 48.0% -0.18 5–7 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 97.9 -1.48
24 2018 1596 106.9 +0.57 +0.53 0.785 45.3% -6 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–0 1–0 — -0.15 2013 1812 143.2 -0.34 +2.87 1.025 50.5% -61 +74 -101 58.9% +0.40 10–7 (59%) 7–3 (70%) 105.3 -0.62
25 2019 1659 119.6 +0.76 -1.60 0.922 48.6% -70 +2 -17 50.0% -0.06 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -1.03 2014 1830 148.3 +1.78 +3.55 1.120 52.6% -7 +105 -122 64.0% +0.85 13–9 (59%) 11–5 (69%) 105.5 +1.60
26 2020 1647 124.1 +2.54 -0.84 1.162 51.8% -15 — — 54.5% +0.46 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.27 2015 1793 149.4 -0.63 +3.13 1.005 49.9% +27 +174 -122 55.3% +0.19 19–7 (73%) 11–4 (73%) 110.8 -1.27
27 2021 1566 109.4 -0.41 -3.05 0.906 48.0% +7 +39 — 34.2% -0.76 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 +0.82 2016 1804 145.7 +3.33 +2.65 1.140 52.6% +4 +149 -64 59.6% +0.74 15–9 (63%) 5–6 (45%) 101.4 +1.43
28 2022 1691 113.4 -0.02 -1.40 0.944 49.3% -36 — — 47.4% -0.58 4–1 (80%) 2–0 — -0.07 2017 1748 140.2 +0.64 +3.29 1.091 51.9% -5 +164 -30 52.8% +0.53 5–7 (42%) 2–8 (20%) 90.1 -1.34
29 2023 1606 124.0 -0.63 -1.56 0.967 49.4% +15 +85 — 41.2% -0.39 2–7 (22%) 1–6 (14%) 88.8 -0.94 2018 1813 142.4 +1.11 +0.48 1.013 50.2% +26 +27 -113 50.0% -0.15 10–4 (71%) 6–5 (55%) 107.3 +0.39
30 2024 1546 100.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1741 136.0 -1.30 +1.97 0.995 49.8% +15 +76 -3 50.0% -0.04 4–6 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 96.4 +1.07
31 2025 1653 102.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — 0.00 2020 1717 126.2 +1.52 +0.87 0.929 48.4% +13 — — 50.0% -0.50 0–2 2–0 — -0.54
32 2026 1572 108.4 +0.38 +2.52 0.771 44.4% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.11 2021 1706 123.3 +1.01 +0.12 0.680 43.7% +27 — — 38.5% -1.15 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 97.3 -0.97
Career — 1743 121.9 +0.93 -1.93 0.961 49.2% -2 -4 -11 44.3% -0.37 26–29 (47%) 15–23 (39%) 98.1 -0.82 — 2032 144.9 +0.25 +2.46 1.041 50.8% -12 +94 -70 55.5% +0.30 107–78 (58%) 66–48 (58%) 107.8 +0.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.