H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Caroline Garcia H2H: 0-2

Caroline Garcia holds a 2–0 lead over Anna-Lena Friedsam in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Caroline Garcia leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Caroline Garcia won the 2021 Parma round of 16 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna-Lena Friedsam
Germany Age 32 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Caroline Garcia
France Age 32 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Caroline Garcia #53 6-2 6-4 Anna-Lena Friedsam #110 Match data May 21, 2021* R16 Parma WTA 250 Clay
Caroline Garcia #39 6-4 7-6(8) Anna-Lena Friedsam #51 Match data Jun 17, 2016* R16 Mallorca International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anna-Lena Friedsam #253 #45 1,160 1,743 62 83 42.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Caroline Garcia #452 #4 5,170 2,002 337 268 55.7% 0 3 1 0 7 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna-Lena Friedsam Caroline Garcia
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2011 2–4 33.3% #142 1,481 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 1–6 14.3% #154 1,445 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2013 8–14 36.4% #74 1,482 0 0
20 2014 7–10 41.2% #85 1,539 0 0 2014 24–23 51.1% #37 1,662 0 1
21 2015 11–14 44.0% #95 1,582 0 0 2015 28–24 53.8% #34 1,706 0 1
22 2016 15–14 51.7% #67 1,645 0 0 2016 32–24 57.1% #24 1,744 0 3
23 2017 0–1 0.0% #507 1,601 0 0 2017 48–22 68.6% #8 1,974 0 5
24 2018 1–2 33.3% #483 1,596 0 0 2018 39–22 63.9% #19 1,922 0 6
25 2019 7–9 43.8% #145 1,658 0 0 2019 24–24 50.0% #46 1,719 0 7
26 2020 5–4 55.6% #111 1,646 0 0 2020 11–11 50.0% #43 1,745 0 7
27 2021 5–11 31.2% #140 1,565 0 0 2021 21–24 46.7% #74 1,694 0 7
28 2022 4–3 57.1% #120 1,690 0 0 2022 44–20 68.8% #4 1,984 0 11
29 2023 7–14 33.3% #135 1,605 0 0 2023 36–26 58.1% #20 1,832 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 2024 15–15 50.0% #48 1,763 0 11
31 2025 0–1 0.0% #154 1,652 0 0 2025 4–9 30.8% #304 1,723 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anna-Lena Friedsam Caroline Garcia
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 5 8 13 38.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2014 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 12 15 27 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2015 7 9 16 43.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 21 16 37 56.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 2016 6 5 11 54.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2016 19 17 36 52.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
23 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 30 14 44 68.2% 12 6 18 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
24 2018 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 24 15 39 61.5% 13 5 18 72.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 9 7 16 56.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
26 2020 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 7 8 15 46.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
27 2021 3 5 8 37.5% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 12 16 28 42.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2022 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2022 23 14 37 62.2% 11 3 14 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — —
29 2023 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2023 26 19 45 57.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 8 9 17 47.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 36 43 79 45.6% 18 28 46 39.1% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — 201 181 382 52.6% 92 62 154 59.7% 44 24 68 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/144 of Anna-Lena Friedsam's and 568/605 of Caroline Garcia's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anna-Lena Friedsam Caroline Garcia
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 6/6 4.8 6.8 56.1% 65.4% 41.9% 59.0% 47.0% 55.5% 40.6%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 7/7 3.1 8.6 53.2% 69.6% 38.1% 46.5% 51.6% 54.7% 40.5%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 19/22 4.5 5.2 58.7% 66.4% 44.4% 53.4% 39.9% 57.2% 36.5%
20 2014 17/17 4.1 4.2 59.9% 64.7% 46.0% 49.9% 55.8% 56.9% 42.6% 2014 43/47 3.7 4.2 59.0% 65.3% 46.8% 53.2% 37.7% 57.7% 39.9%
21 2015 13/25 3.2 4.8 62.7% 64.0% 48.7% 45.1% 40.6% 58.1% 40.1% 2015 43/52 4.3 4.2 65.3% 67.1% 54.0% 53.7% 49.4% 62.2% 38.3%
22 2016 29/29 4.1 2.7 64.0% 66.8% 48.7% 55.2% 47.6% 60.2% 38.8% 2016 48/56 4.1 2.9 60.5% 65.9% 50.1% 48.2% 44.0% 59.7% 41.3%
23 2017 1/1 1.0 1.0 66.2% 51.0% 50.0% 61.5% 66.7% 50.6% 39.1% 2017 66/70 5.0 2.9 63.6% 67.4% 50.7% 56.8% 46.3% 61.4% 42.6%
24 2018 3/3 0.7 3.3 67.6% 52.3% 49.5% 65.9% 60.0% 52.0% 37.7% 2018 60/61 4.1 2.2 67.1% 65.9% 52.1% 57.7% 47.2% 61.4% 41.3%
25 2019 16/16 1.4 3.6 67.0% 62.6% 46.2% 56.0% 50.1% 56.9% 39.8% 2019 48/48 4.0 2.1 67.3% 64.4% 50.8% 55.3% 43.5% 59.7% 39.7%
26 2020 9/9 2.3 2.4 69.6% 67.9% 51.0% 45.4% 37.7% 62.7% 43.3% 2020 22/22 3.5 2.9 62.0% 63.6% 48.2% 57.3% 43.1% 57.5% 39.4%
27 2021 14/16 3.4 3.6 64.3% 63.5% 43.8% 55.2% 37.7% 56.5% 39.4% 2021 44/45 3.8 2.7 62.5% 62.9% 49.4% 53.2% 46.8% 57.8% 40.8%
28 2022 5/7 4.4 4.4 66.0% 62.0% 45.6% 57.1% 64.1% 56.3% 41.2% 2022 63/64 6.4 3.1 60.9% 71.6% 48.8% 60.0% 49.2% 62.6% 39.9%
29 2023 21/21 3.3 3.0 66.8% 62.2% 45.3% 54.4% 54.5% 56.6% 42.0% 2023 62/62 7.3 3.3 60.2% 72.6% 49.5% 63.5% 42.9% 63.4% 38.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 28/30 7.4 3.4 59.1% 71.5% 45.7% 56.9% 41.2% 61.0% 38.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 9/13 3.6 2.1 60.1% 60.1% 43.7% 44.1% 49.0% 53.8% 38.4%
Career — 128/145 3.3 3.4 64.8% 64.0% 47.0% 53.1% 48.7% 57.9% 40.5% — 568/605 4.9 3.2 62.3% 67.3% 49.4% 55.9% 45.1% 60.4% 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anna-Lena Friedsam Caroline Garcia
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1481 101.2 -0.19 -2.02 0.913 48.6% +22 — — 43.8% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.70
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1445 110.6 -0.32 -1.39 0.894 47.7% +27 — — 29.4% -0.88 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 93.9 +0.20
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1482 118.4 +1.16 -4.52 0.853 47.3% +6 +27 — 43.1% -0.73 1–6 (14%) 3–4 (43%) 94.0 +0.45
20 2014 1539 113.8 +0.51 -1.51 0.986 49.8% +15 0 — 43.9% -0.29 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 100.5 -0.25 2014 1663 133.8 +1.54 -2.76 0.944 49.0% -72 +18 -59 47.6% -0.30 9–6 (60%) 10–4 (71%) 110.4 -0.60
21 2015 1583 117.4 -0.11 -1.37 0.957 49.5% +1 -45 — 45.6% -0.30 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 100.4 +0.50 2015 1707 139.3 +3.93 -2.34 1.013 50.3% +9 -53 -109 52.5% +0.25 8–12 (40%) 7–7 (50%) 96.8 -0.37
22 2016 1646 122.7 +3.29 -3.20 0.976 49.4% -4 -78 -8 49.2% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 101.2 -0.35 2016 1744 133.4 +3.27 -1.52 1.024 50.5% -17 -73 -40 53.9% +0.16 11–9 (55%) 9–4 (69%) 106.8 -0.69
23 2017 1602 95.5 -1.10 -1.20 0.792 45.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.11 2017 1974 148.7 +4.65 -0.54 1.105 52.2% -2 -211 -177 62.7% +0.87 16–5 (76%) 12–9 (57%) 110.2 +0.32
24 2018 1596 106.9 +0.57 +0.53 0.785 45.3% -6 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–0 1–0 — -0.15 2018 1923 152.6 +4.38 -0.48 1.070 51.3% +7 -19 -150 60.4% +0.59 13–8 (62%) 7–12 (37%) 99.7 -0.23
25 2019 1658 119.7 +0.76 -1.59 0.922 48.6% -69 +3 -16 50.0% -0.06 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -1.03 2019 1719 131.2 +2.32 -2.18 0.987 49.9% +13 +100 +151 47.3% -0.06 11–5 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 100.1 +0.62
26 2020 1647 124.1 +2.54 -0.84 1.162 51.8% -15 — — 54.5% +0.46 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.27 2020 1746 124.7 +0.99 -2.03 0.927 48.5% -43 +95 — 47.2% -0.45 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 +0.44
27 2021 1566 109.4 -0.41 -3.05 0.906 48.0% +7 +39 — 34.2% -0.76 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 +0.82 2021 1694 129.7 +0.83 -1.96 0.965 49.5% -2 +114 +171 46.6% -0.36 7–6 (54%) 6–3 (67%) 103.5 +0.68
28 2022 1691 113.4 -0.02 -1.40 0.944 49.3% -36 — — 47.4% -0.58 4–1 (80%) 2–0 — -0.07 2022 1985 150.7 +5.57 -1.70 1.069 51.6% -48 -49 +11 63.0% +0.79 16–6 (73%) 12–15 (44%) 104.3 -0.40
29 2023 1606 124.0 -0.63 -1.56 0.967 49.4% +15 +85 — 41.2% -0.39 2–7 (22%) 1–6 (14%) 88.8 -0.94 2023 1832 148.1 +5.79 -3.68 1.052 51.1% +23 +46 +145 57.2% +0.39 12–11 (52%) 11–11 (50%) 97.2 +4.38
30 2024 1545 100.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1764 138.5 +3.01 -3.41 0.979 49.7% +38 +75 — 47.0% -0.20 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 101.9 +0.58
31 2025 1653 102.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — 0.00 2025 1724 135.4 -1.26 -0.80 0.832 46.2% +37 — — 34.5% -0.97 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.6 -0.54
32 2026 1557 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1743 121.9 +0.93 -1.96 0.963 49.2% -2 -4 -11 44.4% -0.36 26–28 (48%) 15–22 (41%) 98.5 -0.75 — 2003 145.7 +3.40 -2.00 1.011 50.4% -5 -5 +3 53.4% +0.18 117–90 (57%) 94–87 (52%) 104.3 +0.92

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.