H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Karin Knapp H2H: 0-1
Karin Knapp holds a 1–0 lead over Anna-Lena Friedsam in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Karin Knapp leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Karin Knapp won the 2015 Nuremberg fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2015* | Nuremberg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Karin Knapp | 6-1 6-3 | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | #227 | #45 | 1,160 | 1,740 | 61 | 83 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Karin Knapp | #971 | #33 | 1,420 | 1,712 | 103 | 117 | 46.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Karin Knapp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #85 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #95 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #205 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #483 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #145 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #111 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #41 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #140 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #120 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #51 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #135 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #147 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #966 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |