H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Margarita Gasparyan H2H: 2-1
Anna-Lena Friedsam holds a 2–1 lead over Margarita Gasparyan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anna-Lena Friedsam leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Margarita Gasparyan leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Margarita Gasparyan won the 2019 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2019* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Margarita Gasparyan | 6-4 6-4 | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Match data |
| Oct 17, 2015* | Linz | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Anna-Lena Friedsam | 6-3 6-4 | Margarita Gasparyan | Match data |
| Oct 2, 2015* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Anna-Lena Friedsam | 6-3 6-4 | Margarita Gasparyan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | #227 | #45 | 1,160 | 1,740 | 61 | 83 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Margarita Gasparyan | #1,358 | #41 | 1,213 | 1,773 | 50 | 57 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Margarita Gasparyan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #85 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #61 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2015 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #95 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #92 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #483 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #104 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #145 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #125 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2020 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #111 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2021 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #140 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #120 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #135 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1358 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |