H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 1-4

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 4–1 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2009 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-3.

GER Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 4
5 main draw meetings
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 26, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Anna-Lena Groenefeld #51 6-4 6-3 Amélie Mauresmo #16 Match data
Mar 11, 2009* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #20 5-7 6-3 6-4 Anna-Lena Groenefeld #65 Match data
Oct 24, 2008* Luxembourg WTA 500 R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #24 6-3 6-1 Anna-Lena Groenefeld #79 Match data
Sep 3, 2005* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #3 7-5 6-3 Anna-Lena Groenefeld #31 Match data
Aug 27, 2005* New Haven WTA 500 QF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-3 6-2 Anna-Lena Groenefeld #32 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anna-Lena Groenefeld #1,012 #14 1,365 1,856 109 130 45.6% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Anna-Lena Groenefeld Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
2003 3–6 33.3% #118 1,515 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
2004 7–15 31.8% #68 1,478 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
2005 36–26 58.1% #21 1,786 0 0 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0
2006 30–26 53.6% #19 1,656 0 1 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0
2007 4–14 22.2% #204 1,527 0 1 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1
2008 7–7 50.0% #76 1,596 0 1 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2
2009 18–23 43.9% #65 1,655 0 1 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6
2010 4–11 26.7% #166 1,563 0 1 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8
2011 0–2 0.0% #266 1,542 0 1 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10
2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15
2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19
2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23
2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24
2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24
2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25