H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Elena Bovina H2H: 0-2
Elena Bovina holds a 2–0 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elena Bovina leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Bovina won the 2004 Filderstadt third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2004* | Filderstadt | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Elena Bovina | 6-2 6-2 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
| May 27, 2004* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Elena Bovina | 3-2 (ret.) | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Elena Bovina | #777 | #14 | 1,758 | 1,960 | 127 | 110 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Elena Bovina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #21 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #61 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1431 | 1,862 | 0 | 3 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #329 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #186 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,728 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #301 | 1,599 | 0 | 3 |