H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Laura Pous-Tio H2H: 1-0

Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Pous-Tio in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2006 Australian Open first round 2-6 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna-Lena Groenefeld
GER Age 41 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Laura Pous-Tio
Spain Age 41 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anna-Lena Groenefeld #21 2-6 6-4 7-5 Laura Pous-Tio #84 Match data Jan 18, 2006* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anna-Lena Groenefeld #1,012 #14 1,365 1,856 109 130 45.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Laura Pous-Tio #776 #72 930 1,620 41 62 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Laura Pous-Tio
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2003 3–6 33.3% #118 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 7–15 31.8% #68 1,478 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2005 36–26 58.1% #21 1,790 0 0 2005 7–7 50.0% #90 1,542 0 0
21 2006 30–26 53.6% #19 1,656 0 1 2006 6–14 30.0% #101 1,497 0 0
22 2007 4–14 22.2% #204 1,527 0 1 2007 3–6 33.3% #165 1,465 0 0
23 2008 7–7 50.0% #76 1,597 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2009 18–23 43.9% #65 1,655 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 2010 4–11 26.7% #166 1,563 0 1 2010 6–6 50.0% #108 1,529 0 0
26 2011 0–2 0.0% #266 1,542 0 1 2011 13–15 46.4% #75 1,589 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2012 6–9 40.0% #157 1,545 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #194 1,531 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2016 0–4 0.0% #287 1,427 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Laura Pous-Tio
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 3 9 12 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 27 16 43 62.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — —
21 2006 10 16 26 38.5% 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
23 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 58 76 134 43.3% 46 39 85 54.1% 3 11 14 21.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — 4 19 23 17.4% 37 40 77 48.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 140/230 of Anna-Lena Groenefeld's and 71/89 of Laura Pous-Tio's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Laura Pous-Tio
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2004 3/22 2.3 3.3 58.5% 65.7% 58.7% 42.9% 40.3% 62.7% 48.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 13/62 3.9 4.3 56.2% 70.4% 51.6% 58.5% 40.0% 62.2% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 40/56 3.2 5.1 58.9% 65.4% 45.4% 57.8% 44.8% 57.3% 42.9% 2006 12/20 1.1 3.2 65.7% 58.4% 48.6% 56.2% 41.7% 55.0% 43.2%
22 2007 16/18 4.6 8.0 52.4% 67.4% 39.9% 52.8% 43.4% 54.0% 38.2% 2007 6/9 1.3 5.2 58.3% 53.0% 43.7% 48.0% 63.9% 49.2% 46.9%
23 2008 13/14 5.1 5.3 47.4% 75.3% 47.4% 51.1% 46.9% 61.2% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 39/41 3.6 5.4 58.2% 64.9% 46.1% 54.3% 54.9% 56.5% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 14/15 2.8 7.0 55.0% 63.7% 38.6% 47.6% 48.2% 52.7% 40.9% 2010 7/12 0.6 2.1 71.6% 57.1% 53.3% 52.3% 57.3% 55.3% 46.4%
26 2011 2/2 1.5 4.0 52.6% 62.6% 38.3% 55.8% 25.0% 51.3% 27.9% 2011 27/28 0.7 2.5 67.4% 55.1% 47.8% 54.8% 53.1% 52.8% 46.5%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 14/15 0.6 3.1 59.3% 61.5% 43.4% 55.3% 52.5% 54.0% 47.9%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 1/1 0.0 2.0 64.4% 51.1% 61.5% 37.5% 50.0% 54.8% 34.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 4/4 0.8 4.8 67.6% 54.9% 33.7% 40.6% 78.6% 48.2% 41.7%
Career — 140/239 3.6 5.6 56.1% 66.7% 45.2% 54.3% 47.1% 57.1% 41.7% — 71/103 0.8 3.0 65.1% 56.9% 46.7% 53.3% 53.8% 53.1% 45.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Laura Pous-Tio
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2003 1516 115.9 — — — — +21 +1 — 38.1% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1478 112.5 +1.14 +0.30 1.285 54.6% +4 +58 — 34.1% -0.61 1–1 0–2 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1790 139.1 +3.94 +1.05 1.197 53.3% -4 -165 -292 57.8% +0.52 8–4 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.9 +1.73 2005 1542 107.3 — — — — -41 +77 — 46.9% -0.56 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — -0.14
21 2006 1656 132.8 +1.54 -0.91 1.005 50.2% -69 +191 -102 52.7% +0.15 10–9 (53%) 6–7 (46%) 98.7 +2.20 2006 1498 111.5 -0.72 -1.49 0.959 49.2% -43 +76 — 36.2% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 0–1 — -0.11
22 2007 1528 109.8 -1.58 -3.51 0.830 46.3% +7 +219 — 25.6% -1.23 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 95.2 +0.69 2007 1466 95.5 -3.89 -0.40 0.924 48.0% — +65 — 35.0% -0.80 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.71
23 2008 1597 128.6 +2.89 -1.21 1.066 50.8% -17 +136 — 51.7% +0.03 0–1 — — -1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 1655 128.8 +0.58 -2.14 0.947 48.9% -56 +88 — 46.3% -0.34 5–12 (29%) 4–6 (40%) 92.8 -1.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 1563 104.5 -2.32 -1.60 0.865 46.9% 0 +100 — 37.8% -1.51 1–6 (14%) 3–0 (100%) 97.3 -0.12 2010 1530 117.0 -0.15 +1.25 1.039 51.0% — +51 — 53.3% +0.13 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.42
26 2011 1542 96.7 -0.53 -1.59 0.574 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.26 2011 1590 119.1 -2.29 +2.09 0.985 49.8% -126 +36 — 44.3% 0.00 4–3 (57%) 2–6 (25%) 100.5 -0.55
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1545 107.7 -1.22 -0.13 1.041 51.1% -104 +94 — 40.6% -0.56 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 94.8 +0.78
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1531 100.6 -1.68 -0.81 0.759 45.0% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.03
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1428 94.0 -2.86 -3.40 0.805 45.3% -10 — — 11.1% -2.22 0–1 — — +0.53
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1414 96.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1857 131.7 +0.84 -1.45 0.971 49.4% -23 +88 -197 47.2% -0.19 27–37 (42%) 17–25 (40%) 92.3 +0.53 — 1621 111.6 -1.76 +0.40 0.977 49.6% -75 +62 — 41.2% -0.42 13–20 (39%) 8–15 (35%) 91.7 +0.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.