H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Maria Elena Camerin H2H: 0-1
Maria Elena Camerin holds a 1–0 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Elena Camerin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Elena Camerin won the 2004 Stockholm third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2004* | Stockholm | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Maria Elena Camerin | 6-2 6-3 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Maria Elena Camerin | #817 | #41 | 774 | 1,666 | 97 | 147 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Maria Elena Camerin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #112 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #123 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #100 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #43 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #50 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #114 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #111 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |