H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Stephanie Foretz Gacon H2H: 0-2
Stephanie Foretz Gacon holds a 2–0 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Stephanie Foretz Gacon leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Stephanie Foretz Gacon won the 2006 Paris third round 6-1 1-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 45
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2006* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | 6-1 1-6 6-0 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
| Jun 8, 2005* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | 6-4 6-3 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Stephanie Foretz Gacon | — | — | — | 1,647 | 61 | 115 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |