H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anna Maria Fernandez vs Adriana Villagran Reami H2H: 1-1
Anna Maria Fernandez and Adriana Villagran Reami are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Adriana Villagran Reami won the 1986 Newport fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 1986* | Newport | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Adriana Villagran Reami | 6-2 6-4 | Anna Maria Fernandez | Match data |
| Dec 13, 1985* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Anna Maria Fernandez | 6-7 7-6 6-3 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Maria Fernandez | — | — | — | 1,717 | 54 | 97 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Adriana Villagran Reami | — | — | — | 1,597 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna Maria Fernandez | Adriana Villagran Reami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,426 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,436 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 13–25 | 34.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |