H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anna Smashnova vs Tiantian Sun H2H: 1-0
Anna Smashnova holds a 1–0 lead over Tiantian Sun in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna Smashnova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Smashnova won the 2002 Shanghai third round 1-6 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 50
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2002* | Shanghai | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Anna Smashnova | 1-6 6-0 6-1 | Tiantian Sun | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Smashnova | #994 | #15 | 1,616 | 1,882 | 242 | 221 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Tiantian Sun | #819 | #77 | 395 | 1,650 | 27 | 54 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna Smashnova | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #236 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #126 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #105 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #68 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #132 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #230 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #47 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #88 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 43–25 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #16 | 1,857 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #43 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,700 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #921 | 1,648 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |