H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anna Tatishvili vs Ksenia Pervak H2H: 0-2
Ksenia Pervak holds a 2–0 lead over Anna Tatishvili in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ksenia Pervak leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ksenia Pervak won the 2012 Montreal second round 7-6(6) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 35
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2012* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ksenia Pervak | 7-6(6) 7-6(4) | Anna Tatishvili | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2011* | Memphis | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ksenia Pervak | 6-3 6-4 | Anna Tatishvili | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Tatishvili | #1,071 | #50 | 1,210 | 1,608 | 43 | 92 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ksenia Pervak | #834 | #37 | 1,475 | 1,703 | 53 | 63 | 45.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Tatishvili | Ksenia Pervak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1156 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #302 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #285 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #129 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #97 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #39 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2011 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2012 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #51 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2014 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #146 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #101 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #200 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #516 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |