H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Annabel Croft vs Elise Burgin H2H: 2-1
Annabel Croft holds a 2–1 lead over Elise Burgin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Annabel Croft leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elise Burgin won the 1987 Birmingham second round 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 1987* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Elise Burgin | 7-6 7-6 | Annabel Croft | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1984* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Annabel Croft | 6-4 6-1 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Jun 21, 1984* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Annabel Croft | 6-3 7-5 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annabel Croft | — | — | — | 1,781 | 84 | 92 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Elise Burgin | #768 | #27 | 20 | 1,845 | 132 | 165 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Annabel Croft | Elise Burgin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1982 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #51 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #40 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #149 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |