H2H data updated: 2026-10-26 00:00 UTC

Annabel Croft vs Elise Burgin H2H: 2-1

Annabel Croft holds a 2–1 lead over Elise Burgin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Annabel Croft leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elise Burgin won the 1987 Birmingham round of 64 7-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Annabel Croft
GBR Age 60
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Elise Burgin
USA Age 64 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Elise Burgin #54 7-6 7-6 Annabel Croft Match data Jun 10, 1987* R64 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Annabel Croft 6-4 6-1 Elise Burgin #67 Match data Aug 22, 1984* R64 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Annabel Croft 6-3 7-5 Elise Burgin #47 Match data Jun 21, 1984* R32 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Annabel Croft — — — 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Elise Burgin — #27 20 1,846 132 165 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Annabel Croft Elise Burgin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1981 9–5 64.3% — 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1982 14–9 60.9% — 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1984 11–14 44.0% — 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1985 23–20 53.5% — 1,762 0 1 1980 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
19 1986 10–19 34.5% — 1,653 0 1 1981 2–3 40.0% — 1,509 0 0
20 1987 8–14 36.4% — 1,575 0 1 1982 7–10 41.2% — 1,584 0 0
21 1988 3–3 50.0% — 1,562 0 1 1983 13–9 59.1% — 1,743 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1984 9–15 37.5% #51 1,716 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1985 29–23 55.8% — 1,773 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1986 25–22 53.2% #40 1,776 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1987 17–21 44.7% #66 1,703 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1988 5–12 29.4% #108 1,629 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1989 16–19 45.7% #62 1,700 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1990 7–19 26.9% #149 1,569 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1991 0–3 0.0% #299 1,527 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1992 2–5 28.6% #166 1,523 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1993 0–2 0.0% #400 1,496 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Annabel Croft Elise Burgin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1980 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1987 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1988 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 11 8 19 57.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 10 7 17 58.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 4 6 10 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 9 11 20 45.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 5 12 17 29.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 32 29 61 52.5% 13 19 32 40.6% 15 27 42 35.7% 11 12 23 47.8% — 64 77 141 45.4% 34 30 64 53.1% 26 34 60 43.3% 8 24 32 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Annabel Croft Elise Burgin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1980 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 1535 118.4 — — — — — — +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 — +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 1589 120.2 — — — — — +11 -33 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +1.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 1595 118.2 — — — — -28 — +2 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 1616 118.3 — — — — -4 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 1762 133.3 — — — — +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.81 1980 1476 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.20
19 1986 1654 120.7 — — — — +69 -92 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.4 -0.28 1981 1509 111.6 — — — — +69 — — 45.5% -0.64 0–1 — — -0.27
20 1987 1575 108.3 — — — — +47 — -107 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.95 1982 1585 111.5 — — — — +15 — — 37.8% -1.19 3–2 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 105.6 -0.39
21 1988 1562 97.6 — — — — +29 — — 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.72 1983 1744 128.2 — — — — +5 — -177 54.0% +0.10 5–1 (83%) 2–0 — -0.98
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1717 125.5 — — — — -22 — -104 37.5% -0.88 5–3 (63%) 4–1 (80%) 105.2 -2.46
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1773 137.6 — — — — -63 -52 -73 51.7% +0.03 11–5 (69%) 6–8 (43%) 106.3 -1.47
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1776 142.8 — — — — -21 +19 -104 53.2% +0.25 7–8 (47%) 4–4 (50%) 98.8 -2.42
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1703 130.3 — — — — -18 +39 +12 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 5–4 (56%) 98.4 -1.43
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1630 115.9 — — — — +12 — +20 33.3% -1.18 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 95.2 -0.24
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1701 132.5 — — — — -21 +35 -80 47.6% -0.30 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.1 -1.29
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1569 112.5 — — — — -10 +144 +32 32.8% -1.49 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 97.2 -1.68
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1528 99.8 — — — — -19 — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.25
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1524 109.4 — — — — +1 +174 — 37.5% -1.50 0–2 — — +0.25
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1497 97.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.02
Career — 1781 125.3 — — — — +49 -69 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.64 — 1846 134.4 — — — — -16 +27 -61 44.7% -0.47 47–47 (50%) 32–28 (53%) 102.8 -4.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.