H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anne Hobbs vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 1-4
Kathy Horvath holds a 4–1 lead over Anne Hobbs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Kathy Horvath leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Kathy Horvath won the 1984 Amelia Island fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 1984* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Kathy Horvath | 6-2 6-2 | Anne Hobbs | Match data |
| Sep 17, 1983* | Tokyo Queen's | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Kathy Horvath | 6-7 6-4 6-4 | Anne Hobbs | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1983 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kathy Horvath | 6-4 6-2 | Anne Hobbs | Match data |
| Sep 19, 1981* | Tokyo Sillook | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Kathy Horvath | 6-4 6-3 | Anne Hobbs | Match data |
| May 7, 1980* | Perugia | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Anne Hobbs | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Kathy Horvath | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Hobbs | #583 | #35 | 18 | 1,842 | 174 | 164 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Kathy Horvath | #283 | #10 | 24 | 1,977 | 192 | 155 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anne Hobbs | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1976 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 26–14 | 65.0% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 2 |
| 1979 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1980 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 39–18 | 68.4% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 1981 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 1983 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,736 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 |
| 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #63 | 1,777 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 1986 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,679 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,530 | 0 | 7 |
| 1987 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #42 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,609 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |