Anne Kremer
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Dokic | 3 | 2 | 5 | Feb 3, 2005 | H2H |
| Lindsay Davenport | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jul 22, 2004 | H2H |
| Paola Suarez | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 27, 2004 | H2H |
| Silvija Talaja | 4 | 1 | 5 | Mar 9, 2004 | H2H |
| Anna Kournikova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 2, 2002 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Anne Kremer vs Tiantian Sun H2H: 1-0
Anne Kremer holds a 1–0 lead over Tiantian Sun in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Kremer won the 2004 Wimbledon round of 64 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Kremer | 6-3 7-5 | Tiantian Sun | Match data | Jun 25, 2004* | R64 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Kremer | #1,039 | #18 | 1,265 | 1,810 | 148 | 185 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Tiantian Sun | #819 | #77 | 395 | 1,649 | 27 | 54 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anne Kremer | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #126 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #105 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #31 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #33 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #230 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #401 | 1,635 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #94 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #165 | 1,518 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,524 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #82 | 1,517 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #265 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #331 | 1,474 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #238 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Anne Kremer | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1995 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2004 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2005 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2006 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 19 | 14 | 33 | 57.6% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2007 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 12 | 15 | 27 | 44.4% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 2008 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 73 | 104 | 177 | 41.2% | 33 | 40 | 73 | 45.2% | 27 | 23 | 50 | 54.0% | 15 | 18 | 33 | 45.5% | Career | 22 | 41 | 63 | 34.9% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
Performance Progression by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 41/71 of Anne Kremer's and 28/56 of Tiantian Sun's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Anne Kremer | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2005 | 5/18 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 69.3% | 58.4% | 35.9% | 47.0% | 58.1% | 51.0% | 43.0% | 2003 | 1/9 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 59.4% | 60.5% | 30.8% | 28.6% | 28.6% | 48.4% | 40.0% |
| 2006 | 5/12 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 62.0% | 50.4% | 41.6% | 42.4% | 30.3% | 47.5% | 42.1% | 2006 | 9/24 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 67.2% | 58.1% | 44.5% | 53.0% | 49.3% | 53.8% | 37.5% |
| 2007 | 12/20 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 70.8% | 54.9% | 43.4% | 43.1% | 45.8% | 51.6% | 42.4% | 2007 | 14/18 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 65.0% | 55.8% | 43.0% | 44.6% | 35.3% | 51.3% | 40.4% |
| 2008 | 9/10 | 1.0 | 3.8 | 62.2% | 52.5% | 39.7% | 44.1% | 42.5% | 47.5% | 42.9% | 2008 | 4/5 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 65.6% | 55.4% | 41.8% | 51.8% | 30.6% | 51.0% | 36.8% |
| 2009 | 3/4 | 0.7 | 4.7 | 60.9% | 59.4% | 32.9% | 41.7% | 30.0% | 49.0% | 36.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 7/7 | 1.7 | 2.6 | 66.0% | 52.0% | 38.2% | 34.7% | 59.6% | 47.4% | 38.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 41/333 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 66.1% | 54.1% | 39.8% | 42.2% | 45.9% | 49.2% | 41.4% | Career | 28/81 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 65.6% | 56.6% | 42.8% | 47.8% | 38.8% | 52.0% | 38.9% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Anne Kremer | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1995 | 1517 | 108.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | — | — | — | -0.09 | 2002 | 1493 | 101.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.19 |
| 1996 | 1508 | 105.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +41 | +58 | 26.7% | -1.47 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.12 | 2003 | 1451 | 101.0 | -0.20 | -1.27 | 0.776 | 43.9% | +17 | — | — | 22.2% | -1.67 | 0–2 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.54 |
| 1997 | 1509 | 117.6 | — | — | — | — | +41 | — | — | 26.7% | -1.27 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | -0.53 | 2004 | 1430 | 103.5 | — | — | — | — | -34 | +118 | — | 24.0% | -1.68 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.02 |
| 1998 | 1552 | 126.8 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | — | 36.4% | -1.09 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.65 | 2005 | 1520 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | -19 | — | — | 57.7% | +0.69 | 1–1 | 3–1 (75%) | — | +0.62 |
| 1999 | 1640 | 130.5 | — | — | — | — | -17 | -83 | -13 | 46.8% | -0.28 | 6–8 (43%) | 4–6 (40%) | 98.6 | +1.35 | 2006 | 1629 | 131.4 | -1.14 | -2.98 | 0.811 | 45.8% | -16 | — | — | 52.7% | -0.04 | 2–5 (29%) | — | — | -0.16 |
| 2000 | 1708 | 137.5 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -167 | +12 | 54.7% | +0.39 | 5–8 (38%) | 7–8 (47%) | 96.9 | +0.80 | 2007 | 1505 | 100.0 | -2.48 | -2.77 | 0.830 | 45.9% | +49 | -23 | — | 20.5% | -2.13 | 1–2 (33%) | 4–1 (80%) | 101.7 | -1.14 |
| 2001 | 1695 | 135.0 | — | — | — | — | +2 | -55 | +63 | 51.4% | +0.08 | 13–9 (59%) | 7–6 (54%) | 106.4 | -0.14 | 2008 | 1494 | 101.6 | -1.21 | -2.08 | 0.750 | 43.9% | +30 | — | — | 30.8% | -1.62 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.7 | +0.02 |
| 2002 | 1671 | 136.3 | — | — | — | — | -30 | +44 | +113 | 48.9% | +0.03 | 11–6 (65%) | 5–8 (38%) | 100.9 | -0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 1635 | 94.6 | — | — | — | — | -26 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | — | — | — | +0.58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 1606 | 116.6 | — | — | — | — | -50 | +62 | +217 | 45.2% | -0.32 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–2 (67%) | 97.5 | -0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1519 | 109.7 | -2.01 | -0.99 | 0.878 | 46.9% | -41 | +130 | +270 | 32.5% | -1.13 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–1 | — | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 1525 | 108.9 | -3.12 | -1.22 | 0.801 | 44.7% | -70 | +140 | — | 33.3% | -1.56 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–1 | — | -0.81 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 1517 | 118.0 | -2.42 | -0.54 | 0.875 | 46.9% | -37 | +124 | — | 41.9% | -0.67 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–1 | — | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 1460 | 103.3 | -3.64 | -1.04 | 0.816 | 45.2% | +16 | +103 | — | 30.0% | -1.70 | 0–2 | 2–0 | — | +0.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 1474 | 105.0 | -0.28 | -0.99 | 0.717 | 42.3% | +16 | — | — | 14.3% | -2.57 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 1463 | 94.3 | -4.07 | -2.73 | 0.727 | 42.9% | +14 | — | — | 31.3% | -1.81 | 1–1 | 2–0 | — | +0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1810 | 132.2 | -2.85 | -1.19 | 0.815 | 45.3% | -14 | +3 | +102 | 45.5% | -0.32 | 47–51 (48%) | 33–33 (50%) | 100.8 | -0.12 | Career | 1650 | 117.9 | -1.79 | -2.69 | 0.810 | 45.5% | 0 | +30 | — | 37.4% | -0.93 | 6–15 (29%) | 11–8 (58%) | 98.4 | -0.41 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Tiantian Sun
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginie Razzano | 0 | 3 | 3 | Feb 20, 2008 | H2H |
| Gisela Dulko | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 8, 2007 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 17, 2008 | H2H |
| Anastasia Rodionova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 6, 2008 | H2H |
| Martina Hingis | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 20, 2007 | H2H |