H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anne Smith vs Elise Burgin H2H: 1-1
Anne Smith and Elise Burgin are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Smith leads 1–0 on carpet, while Elise Burgin leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1989 Worcester third round 3-6 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 1989* | Worcester | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Anne Smith | 3-6 7-6 6-1 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1987* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Elise Burgin | 6-4 7-5 | Anne Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Elise Burgin | #768 | #27 | 20 | 1,845 | 132 | 165 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Smith | Elise Burgin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #51 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #40 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #149 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |