H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Annika Beck vs Na Li H2H: 0-1

Na Li holds a 1–0 lead over Annika Beck in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Na Li leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Na Li won the 2014 Shenzhen semifinal 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Annika Beck
Germany Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Na Li #3 6-1 6-3 Annika Beck #58 Match data Jan 4, 2014* SF Shenzhen International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Annika Beck #903 #37 1,455 1,730 90 115 43.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,117 338 159 68.0% 2 1 0 1 5 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Annika Beck Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2012 2–5 28.6% #78 1,483 0 0 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0
19 2013 20–24 45.5% #58 1,608 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0
20 2014 20–22 47.6% #53 1,664 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2015 20–20 50.0% #58 1,649 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2016 21–27 43.8% #51 1,659 0 2 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1
23 2017 7–17 29.2% #178 1,496 0 2 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,819 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,863 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,849 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5
30 — — — — — — — 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 1,999 1 6
31 — — — — — — — 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7
32 — — — — — — — 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Annika Beck Na Li
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2012 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 9 15 24 37.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 16 13 29 55.2% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 10 12 22 45.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 9 18 27 33.3% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2004 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 5 10 15 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 13 5 18 72.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 51 71 122 41.8% 32 35 67 47.8% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — 222 104 326 68.1% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 186/205 of Annika Beck's and 372/485 of Na Li's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Annika Beck Na Li
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2012 6/7 0.8 6.0 66.0% 59.3% 35.3% 52.6% 51.1% 51.3% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 40/44 0.8 4.2 68.6% 57.1% 38.8% 47.7% 46.3% 51.5% 46.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 40/42 0.7 3.4 74.1% 55.2% 37.4% 49.6% 53.2% 51.1% 48.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 30/40 0.8 3.5 77.3% 55.7% 45.9% 50.5% 54.6% 53.3% 47.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 46/48 0.7 2.6 72.1% 56.3% 40.6% 48.1% 55.2% 51.9% 46.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 24/24 0.3 2.8 72.3% 50.1% 42.2% 42.9% 47.1% 48.2% 42.5% 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 33/34 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0%
Career — 186/205 0.7 3.4 72.5% 55.4% 40.4% 48.2% 51.6% 51.4% 46.4% — 372/497 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Annika Beck Na Li
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2012 1483 99.9 -3.28 -1.53 0.857 46.7% +35 — — 38.9% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.20 2000 1497 107.1 — — — — +34 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.21
19 2013 1609 119.0 -3.11 +1.67 0.961 49.0% -53 +29 -80 45.6% -0.32 8–9 (47%) 5–7 (42%) 99.7 -0.05 2001 1481 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12
20 2014 1664 130.7 -3.80 +3.73 0.990 49.7% +27 -111 -85 44.7% -0.23 8–4 (67%) 4–7 (36%) 104.7 -1.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 1650 124.8 -3.30 +3.51 1.013 50.5% -24 -25 -40 52.1% +0.40 5–11 (31%) 1–2 (33%) 93.7 +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 1659 128.1 -3.44 +2.56 0.968 49.3% -63 +23 -17 44.3% -0.28 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.9 -0.82 2004 1600 125.7 — — — — +18 — — 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
23 2017 1497 103.0 -5.40 -0.53 0.820 45.6% +38 +82 — 28.0% -1.94 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.41 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 — 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1820 150.2 +2.75 +2.06 1.133 52.7% +69 -38 -48 62.2% +0.96 7–7 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.0 +0.95
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1864 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 — -127 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.2 -1.80
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1938 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +49 -152 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.4 -2.23
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1850 150.5 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -23 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.93
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1862 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -57 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2000 162.2 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2067 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +56 -126 -177 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -110 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97
Career — 1731 124.6 -3.67 +2.24 0.954 48.9% -16 +3 -57 44.3% -0.33 29–34 (46%) 16–20 (44%) 99.1 -0.89 — 2117 160.4 +4.01 +3.66 1.175 53.4% +13 -21 -66 65.1% +1.13 89–64 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.5 -1.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.