H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Aryna Sabalenka vs Alison Riske-Amritraj H2H: 4-0
Aryna Sabalenka holds a 4–0 lead over Alison Riske-Amritraj in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Aryna Sabalenka leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Aryna Sabalenka won the 2022 Charleston third round 7-6(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 28
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2022* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Aryna Sabalenka | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Match data |
| Jun 25, 2021* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Aryna Sabalenka | 6-1 6-4 | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Match data |
| Sep 28, 2019* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | F | Hard | Aryna Sabalenka | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Match data |
| Jan 6, 2019* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Aryna Sabalenka | 4-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | #1 | #1 | 12,420 | 2,323 | 399 | 138 | 74.3% | 4 | 11 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 24 |
| Alison Riske-Amritraj | #1,157 | #18 | 2,360 | 1,853 | 191 | 202 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aryna Sabalenka | Alison Riske-Amritraj | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2017 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #96 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,937 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #11 | 1,936 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 28–9 | 75.7% | #10 | 2,005 | 0 | 8 | 2013 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #57 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #2 | 1,986 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2022 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #5 | 1,956 | 0 | 10 | 2015 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #97 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #2 | 2,082 | 1 | 13 | 2016 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #39 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,170 | 3 | 17 | 2017 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #70 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 64–12 | 84.2% | #1 | 2,225 | 4 | 21 | 2018 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #62 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2026 | 36–6 | 85.7% | #1 | 2,214 | 4 | 24 | 2019 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #26 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #51 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #659 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |