H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Aryna Sabalenka vs Camila Giorgi H2H: 1-2
Camila Giorgi holds a 2–1 lead over Aryna Sabalenka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Camila Giorgi leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Camila Giorgi won the 2022 Roland Garros third round 4-6 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 28
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Camila Giorgi | 4-6 6-1 6-0 | Aryna Sabalenka | Match data |
| Jun 26, 2021* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Camila Giorgi | 7-6(5) 0-6 6-4 | Aryna Sabalenka | Match data |
| Apr 14, 2018* | Lugano | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Aryna Sabalenka | 6-3 6-0 | Camila Giorgi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | #1 | #1 | 12,420 | 2,323 | 399 | 138 | 74.3% | 4 | 11 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 24 |
| Camila Giorgi | #116 | #26 | 1,978 | 1,875 | 204 | 184 | 52.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aryna Sabalenka | Camila Giorgi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2017 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #96 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,937 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #11 | 1,936 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 28–9 | 75.7% | #10 | 2,005 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #2 | 1,986 | 0 | 10 | 2015 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2022 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #5 | 1,956 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #2 | 2,082 | 1 | 13 | 2017 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #78 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,170 | 3 | 17 | 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2025 | 64–12 | 84.2% | #1 | 2,225 | 4 | 21 | 2019 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #100 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2026 | 36–6 | 85.7% | #1 | 2,214 | 4 | 24 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #76 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #66 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #53 | 1,788 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #116 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |